• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚使用缓释丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖的医疗服务提供者成本。

Provider costs of treating opioid dependence with extended-release buprenorphine in Australia.

作者信息

Settumba Stella, Shahbazi Jeyran, Byrne Marianne, Degenhardt Louisa, Grebely Jason, Larance Briony, Nielsen Suzanne, Lintzeris Nicholas, Ali Robert, Rodgers Craig, Blazey Alison, Weiss Robert, Dunlop Adrian, McDonough Michael, Cook Jon, Farrell Michael

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025 Jan;44(1):179-194. doi: 10.1111/dar.13956. Epub 2024 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/dar.13956
PMID:39370671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11743055/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The costs of providing medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence can determine its scale of provision. To provide estimates of the costs of extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR), we performed a bottom-up costing analysis of provider operational treatment costs.

METHODS

Data were collected in a single-arm open label trial of BUP-XR injections conducted in specialist public drug treatment services and primary care private practices in three Australian states (the CoLAB study). The unit costs of resources used for each activity were combined with quantities used at each participating facility to arrive at the average annual cost per client.

RESULTS

One hundred participants across the six health facility sites received monthly subcutaneous BUP-XR injections administered by a health-care practitioner. The average cost of providing 1 year of treatment per participant was $6656 ($6026-$8326). Screening cost (initial assessment and medical history) was $282 while monthly follow-up appointments cost $531 per client. The main cost driver was the monthly treatment costs accounting for 79% of the average annual client cost, with medication costs comprising 95% of this cost.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

With medication costs making up the largest proportion of treatment costs, treatment using BUP-XR has the potential to free up other health system resources, for example, staff time. The costs reported in this study can be used in an economic evaluation to estimate the net benefit or cost-effectiveness of BUP-XR especially when compared to other opioid agonist treatments.

摘要

引言

提供阿片类药物依赖药物辅助治疗的成本会决定其提供规模。为了估算缓释丁丙诺啡(BUP-XR)的成本,我们对提供者的运营治疗成本进行了自下而上的成本分析。

方法

数据收集于一项在澳大利亚三个州的专科公共药物治疗服务机构和初级保健私人诊所进行的BUP-XR注射单臂开放标签试验(CoLAB研究)。将每项活动所用资源的单位成本与每个参与机构的使用量相结合,得出每位患者的平均年度成本。

结果

六个医疗机构站点的100名参与者接受了由医护人员每月进行的皮下BUP-XR注射。每位参与者提供1年治疗的平均成本为6656美元(6026 - 8326美元)。筛查成本(初始评估和病史)为282美元,而每位患者每月的随访预约成本为531美元。主要成本驱动因素是每月的治疗成本,占平均年度患者成本的79%,其中药物成本占该成本的95%。

讨论与结论

由于药物成本占治疗成本的比例最大,使用BUP-XR进行治疗有可能释放其他卫生系统资源,例如工作人员时间。本研究报告的成本可用于经济评估,以估算BUP-XR的净效益或成本效益,特别是与其他阿片类激动剂治疗相比时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/11743055/78c93a72716e/DAR-44-179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/11743055/655ed1764cb6/DAR-44-179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/11743055/78c93a72716e/DAR-44-179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/11743055/655ed1764cb6/DAR-44-179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/11743055/78c93a72716e/DAR-44-179-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Provider costs of treating opioid dependence with extended-release buprenorphine in Australia.澳大利亚使用缓释丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖的医疗服务提供者成本。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025 Jan;44(1):179-194. doi: 10.1111/dar.13956. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
2
Effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid use disorder: secondary analyses of prospective cohort study data.美沙酮与丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的有效性:前瞻性队列研究数据的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e095645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095645.
3
Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation.美沙酮和丁丙诺啡用于阿片类药物依赖的管理:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(9):1-171, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11090.
4
High induction rate onto extended-release naltrexone for people with opioid use disorder: experiences from a Norwegian naturalistic study.长效纳曲酮对阿片类物质使用障碍患者的高诱导率:一项挪威自然主义研究的经验
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00576-9.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone Compared With Methadone Maintenance and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Dependence.与美沙酮维持治疗和丁丙诺啡维持治疗相比,注射用长效纳曲酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的成本效益分析
Subst Abus. 2015;36(2):226-31. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1010031. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
6
96-week retention in treatment with extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine depot injections among people with opioid dependence: Extended follow-up after a single-arm trial.阿片类药物依赖患者皮下注射丁丙诺啡缓释植入剂治疗 96 周的保留率:一项单臂试验的扩展随访。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 May;127:104390. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104390. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation.口服纳曲酮用于预防曾对阿片类药物依赖的吸毒者复吸:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(6):iii-iv, 1-85. doi: 10.3310/hta11060.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Effects of buprenorphine on opioid craving in comparison to other medications for opioid use disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.丁丙诺啡对比其他药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍戒断症状的效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Addict Behav. 2023 Apr;139:107589. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107589. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
10
Open-label, multicentre, single-arm trial of monthly injections of depot buprenorphine in people with opioid dependence: protocol for the CoLAB study.开放性、多中心、单臂试验:每月注射储存型丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖患者:CoLAB 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 31;10(7):e034389. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034389.

本文引用的文献

1
Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.每月一次缓释丁丙诺啡与每日标准护理药物相比的优越性和成本效益:一项实用、平行组、开放标签、多中心、随机、对照的3期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 17;66:102311. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model.新南威尔士州惩教中心的丁丙诺啡储存作为阿片类激动剂治疗:成本模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8.
3
Can a new formulation of opiate agonist treatment alter stigma?: Place, time and things in the experience of extended-release buprenorphine depot.
新型阿片类激动剂治疗能否改变污名化?:长效丁丙诺啡储库的体验中的地点、时间和事物。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Sep;107:103788. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103788. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Examining the cost and impact of dosing fees among clients in opioid agonist treatment: Results from a cross-sectional survey of Australian treatment clients.调查阿片类激动剂治疗中患者剂量费用的成本和影响:对澳大利亚治疗患者的横断面调查结果。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 May;41(4):841-850. doi: 10.1111/dar.13437. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Feasibility and outcomes of a general practice and specialist alcohol and other drug collaborative care program in Sydney, Australia.澳大利亚悉尼的一般实践和专家酒精及其他药物联合护理计划的可行性和结果。
Aust J Prim Health. 2022 Apr;28(2):158-163. doi: 10.1071/PY20197.
6
Outcomes of a single-arm implementation trial of extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine depot injections in people with opioid dependence.阿片类药物依赖患者皮下持续释放丁丙诺啡缓释注射剂单臂实施试验的结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103492. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103492. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Economic analysis of out-of-pocket costs among people in opioid agonist treatment: A cross-sectional survey in three Australian jurisdictions.阿片类药物激动剂治疗者自付费用的经济分析:澳大利亚三个司法管辖区的横断面调查。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103472. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103472. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
8
Tracing the affordances of long-acting injectable depot buprenorphine: A qualitative study of patients' experiences in Australia.追踪长效注射型丁丙诺啡的使用效益:澳大利亚患者体验的定性研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Oct 1;227:108959. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108959. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Association of Opioid Agonist Treatment With All-Cause Mortality and Specific Causes of Death Among People With Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿片类激动剂治疗与阿片类药物依赖患者全因死亡率及特定死因的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):979-993. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.每周和每月皮下注射长效纳曲酮与每日舌下含服丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物依赖的患者报告结局:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219041. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9041.