Suppr超能文献

动植物奶泡沫的生动生与死。

The bubbly life and death of animal and plant milk foams.

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.

Motif FoodWorks Inc., Boston, MA 02210, USA.

出版信息

Soft Matter. 2024 Oct 23;20(41):8215-8229. doi: 10.1039/d4sm00518j.

Abstract

Milk foams are fragile objects, readily prepared for frothy cappuccinos and lattes using bovine milk. However, evolving consumer preferences driven by health, climate change, veganism, and sustainability have created a substantial demand for creating frothy beverages using plant-based milk alternatives or plant milks. In this contribution, we characterize maximum foam volume and half-lifetime as metrics for foamability and foam stability and drainage kinetics of two animal milks (cow and goat) and compared them to those of the six most popular, commercially available plant milks: almond, oat, soy, pea, coconut, and rice. We used three set-ups: an electric frother with cold (10 °C) and hot (65 °C) settings to emulate the real-life application of creating foam for cappuccinos, a commercial device called a dynamic foam analyzer or DFA and fizzics-scope, a bespoke device we built. Fizzics-scope visualizes foam creation, evolution, and destruction using an extended prism-based imaging system facilitating the capture of spatiotemporal variation in foam microstructure over a broader range of heights and liquid fractions. Among the chosen eight milks, oat produces the longest-lasting foams, and rice has the lowest amount and stability of foam. Using the hot settings, animal milks produce more foam volume using an electric frother than the top three plant milks in terms of foamability (oat, pea, and soy). Using the cold settings, oat, soy, and almond outperform cow milk in terms of foam volume and lifetime for foams made with the frother and sparging. Most plant milks have higher viscosity due to added polysaccharide thickeners, and in some, lecithin and saponin can supplement globular proteins as emulsifiers. Our studies combining foam creation by frothing or sparging with imaging protocols to track global foam volume and local bubble size changes present opportunities for contrasting the physicochemical properties and functional attributes of animal and plant-based milk and ingredients for engineering better alternatives.

摘要

牛奶泡沫是脆弱的物体,使用牛奶奶源很容易制备出泡沫丰富的卡布奇诺和拿铁咖啡。然而,由于健康、气候变化、素食主义和可持续性等因素的推动,消费者的偏好不断发展,对使用植物性牛奶替代品或植物奶来制作泡沫丰富的饮料的需求大幅增加。在本研究中,我们将最大泡沫体积和半衰期分别作为衡量泡沫形成能力和泡沫稳定性的指标,并对两种动物奶(牛奶和羊奶)进行了分析,然后与六种最常见的商业植物奶(杏仁奶、燕麦奶、豆奶、豌豆奶、椰奶和米奶)进行了比较。我们使用了三种设置:带有冷(10°C)和热(65°C)设置的电动打泡器,以模拟为制作卡布奇诺而产生泡沫的实际应用;一种名为动态泡沫分析仪或 DFA 的商用设备;以及我们自主搭建的 Fizzics-scope 设备。Fizzics-scope 使用扩展的基于棱镜的成像系统可视化泡沫的形成、演变和破坏,该系统便于在更广泛的高度和液体分数范围内捕获泡沫微观结构的时空变化。在所选择的八种奶中,燕麦奶产生的泡沫持续时间最长,而米奶产生的泡沫量和稳定性最低。使用热设置时,在电动打泡器方面,与三种最受欢迎的植物奶(燕麦奶、豌豆奶和大豆奶)相比,动物奶在泡沫形成能力方面产生的泡沫体积更多。使用冷设置时,在使用打泡器和注气时,燕麦奶、大豆奶和杏仁奶在泡沫体积和寿命方面均优于牛奶奶源。大多数植物奶由于添加了多糖增稠剂,因此具有更高的粘度,在某些植物奶中,卵磷脂和皂角苷可以作为乳化剂补充球状蛋白质。我们的研究将通过打泡或注气来制备泡沫与成像方案相结合,以跟踪全局泡沫体积和局部气泡大小变化,为对比动物和植物奶以及成分的物理化学性质和功能属性提供了机会,从而为工程设计更好的替代品提供了机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验