Mussini Cristina, Cazanave Charles, Adachi Eisuke, Eu Beng, Alonso Marta Montero, Crofoot Gordon, Chounta Vasiliki, Kolobova Irina, Sutton Kenneth, Sutherland-Phillips Denise, Urbaityte Rimgaile, Ehmann Alice, Scherzer Jenny, de Los Rios Patricia, D'Amico Ronald, Spreen William, van Wyk Jean
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Pellegrin Hospital, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jan;29(1):64-76. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04490-0. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
SOLAR (NCT04542070; registered 2020-09-09) is a Phase 3b study that demonstrated the noninferior virological efficacy of switching to cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB + RPV LA) dosed every 2 months vs. continuing daily oral bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) over 12 months. Participants were randomised (2:1) to switch to CAB + RPV LA or to continue BIC/FTC/TAF. Patient-reported endpoints included treatment preference, treatment satisfaction (12-item HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version), acceptability of injections (Perception of Injection questionnaire [acceptability domain]) and three single-item questions exploring psychological challenges related to HIV treatment (fear of disclosure, adherence-related anxiety and reminder of HIV status). Of 670 participants, 447 participants switched to CAB + RPV LA and 223 continued BIC/FTC/TAF. Overall, 18% were female, median age was 37 years and 31% were non-White. At Month 12, CAB + RPV LA significantly improved treatment satisfaction vs. BIC/FTC/TAF (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] change: + 3.36 [2.59, 4.13] vs. -1.59 [-2.71, -0.47]; p < 0.001). At Month 12, a higher proportion of CAB + RPV LA arm participants reported improvements across the psychological challenges related to HIV treatment questions compared with BIC/FTC/TAF participants. Participants indicating ≥ 1 psychological challenge at baseline experienced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in treatment satisfaction after 12 months of CAB + RPV LA vs. continuing BIC/FTC/TAF (adjusted difference [95% CI]: 7.96 [5.65, 10.26]; p < 0.001). Most (90%, 382/425) questionnaire respondents preferred CAB + RPV LA vs. BIC/FTC/TAF (5%, 21/425). Switching to CAB + RPV LA was associated with significantly improved treatment satisfaction and relief from the fear of disclosure, anxiety surrounding adherence and reminder of HIV status.
SOLAR(NCT04542070;于2020年9月9日注册)是一项3b期研究,该研究表明,每2个月注射一次卡博特韦+rilpivirine长效制剂(CAB+RPV LA),与持续每日口服比克替拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(BIC/FTC/TAF)相比,在12个月期间具有非劣效的病毒学疗效。参与者被随机分组(2:1),分别转换至CAB+RPV LA或继续使用BIC/FTC/TAF。患者报告的终点包括治疗偏好、治疗满意度(12项HIV治疗满意度问卷状态版)、注射接受度(注射认知问卷[接受度领域])以及三个探索与HIV治疗相关心理挑战的单项问题(对披露的恐惧、与依从性相关的焦虑和对HIV状态的提醒)。在670名参与者中,447名参与者转换至CAB+RPV LA,223名继续使用BIC/FTC/TAF。总体而言,18%为女性,中位年龄为37岁,31%为非白人。在第12个月时,与BIC/FTC/TAF相比,CAB+RPV LA显著提高了治疗满意度(平均[95%置信区间(CI)]变化:+3.36[2.59,4.13]对-1.59[-2.71,-0.47];p<0.001)。在第12个月时,与BIC/FTC/TAF参与者相比,CAB+RPV LA组中更高比例的参与者报告在与HIV治疗相关问题的心理挑战方面有所改善。在基线时表示有≥1项心理挑战的参与者,在接受CAB+RPV LA治疗12个月后与继续使用BIC/FTC/TAF相比,治疗满意度有统计学上显著且具有临床意义的改善(调整差异[95%CI]:7.96[5.65,10.26];p<0.001)。大多数(90%,382/425)问卷受访者更喜欢CAB+RPV LA而非BIC/FTC/TAF(5%,21/425)。转换至CAB+RPV LA与治疗满意度显著提高以及对披露的恐惧、依从性焦虑和HIV状态提醒的缓解相关。