Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, E8i, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74230-w.
To evaluate the intra- and interdevice repeatability of microperimetry (MP) assessments in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) two consecutive MP testings (45 fovea-centered stimuli, 4-2 staircase strategy) were performed using MP3 (NIDEK, Aichi, Japan) and MAIA (CenterVue, Padova, Italy), respectively. Intraretinal fluid (IRF) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) thickness were automatically segmented by published deep learning algorithms. Hard exudates (HEs) were annotated semi-automatically and disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) was segmented manually. Point-to-point registration of MP stimuli to corresponding spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) locations was performed for both devices. Repeatability was assessed overall and in areas of disease-specific OCT biomarkers using Bland-Altmann coefficients of repeatability (CoR). A total of 3600 microperimetry stimuli were tested in 20 eyes with DME. Global CoR was high using both devices (MP3: ± 6.55 dB, MAIA: ± 7.69 dB). Higher retest variances were observed in stimuli with IRF (MP3: CoR ± 7.4 dB vs. ± 6.0 dB, p = 0.001, MAIA: CoR ± 9.2dB vs. ± 6.8 dB, p = 0.002) and DRIL on MP3 (CoR ± 6.9 dB vs. ± 3.2 dB, p < 0.001) compared to stimuli without. Repeatabilities were reduced in areas with thinner EZ layers (both p < 0.05). Fixation (Fuji classification) was relatively unstable independent of device and run. These findings emphasize taking higher caution using MP in patients with DME.
为了评估糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者的微视野计(MP)评估的内设备和间设备重复性,分别使用 MP3(尼德克,日本爱知县)和 MAIA(CenterVue,帕多瓦,意大利)进行了两次连续的 MP 测试(45 个中央凹注视刺激,4-2 阶梯策略)。通过已发表的深度学习算法自动分割视网膜内液(IRF)和椭圆体带(EZ)厚度。硬性渗出物(HE)被半自动注释,视网膜内层紊乱(DRIL)被手动分割。为了这两种设备,将 MP 刺激点与相应的光谱域 OCT(Spectralis,海德堡工程,德国)位置进行了点对点注册。使用可重复性的重复性 Bland-Altman 系数(CoR)评估了整个疾病特异性 OCT 生物标志物区域和设备内的重复性。在 20 只患有 DME 的眼中测试了总共 3600 个微视野刺激。两种设备的全局 CoR 均较高(MP3:±6.55 dB,MAIA:±7.69 dB)。在具有 IRF(MP3:CoR±7.4 dB 与±6.0 dB,p=0.001,MAIA:CoR±9.2dB 与±6.8 dB,p=0.002)和 DRIL 的刺激物中观察到更高的复测方差与无刺激物相比,MP3 上的(CoR±6.9 dB 与±3.2 dB,p<0.001)。在 EZ 层较薄的区域,重复性降低(两者均 p<0.05)。无论设备和运行如何,固视(富士分类)均相对不稳定。这些发现强调了在 DME 患者中使用 MP 时需要更高的谨慎性。