Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06758-8.
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals identify universal access to sexual and reproductive health services as a global priority. Yet barriers to abortion access remain, including legal restrictions, cost, stigma, and limited services and information. The aim was to identify barriers to and facilitators of abortion care access experienced in Australia.
This qualitative phenomenological study examined abortion access in Australia, where abortion is decriminalised, from March 2020 to December 2022. We used social media and flyers in clinics to recruit adults who had sought abortion care, then interviewed them in-depth. We mapped participant experiences to five dimensions of access identified by Levesque et al.'s patient-centred access to healthcare framework: approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.
The 24 participants lived across Australia and sought abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approachability: Before seeking abortion, most did not know where to access information about the service and where to obtain it. Acceptability: Many were uncomfortable disclosing their abortion to family or friends; they reported that healthcare providers demonstrated varying levels of support. Availability and accommodation: Regional participants travelled far and faced long wait-times, exacerbated by pandemic restrictions. Affordability: Participants described financial stress paying for the service, travel, and related expenses. Appropriateness: Most participants expected judgemental care. Experiences varied widely: many participants experienced unempathetic, rushed, or judgemental interactions with healthcare staff, and many also reported at least one non-judgmental and supportive interaction on the same pathway to care.
Abortion seekers experienced varying obstacles when seeking care. The findings illustrate the need for population- and system-level initiatives such as: providing accurate information about and normalising abortion; implementing system-level strategies to reduce wait times, travel, and costs, especially for rural populations; and developing regulatory and quality improvement initiatives to increase the workforce and its readiness to provide high-quality, non-judgemental abortion care. Challenges seeking care during pandemic restrictions illustrate the importance of social support during care and choice between abortion modalities and service types. Consumer voices can help understand the diverse pathways to abortion care and inform solutions to overcome the multidimensional barriers to access.
联合国可持续发展目标将普遍获得性与生殖健康服务确定为全球优先事项。然而,堕胎服务的可及性仍然存在障碍,包括法律限制、费用、污名化以及服务和信息有限。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚堕胎服务可及性的障碍和促进因素。
本定性现象学研究于 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,检查了澳大利亚的堕胎可及性,澳大利亚的堕胎是合法的。我们使用社交媒体和诊所传单招募寻求堕胎服务的成年人,然后对他们进行深入访谈。我们将参与者的经验映射到 Levesque 等人的以患者为中心的医疗保健获取框架中的五个方面:可接近性、可接受性、可用性和适应性、可负担性和适宜性。
24 名参与者分布在澳大利亚各地,在 COVID-19 大流行期间寻求堕胎。可接近性:在寻求堕胎之前,大多数人不知道在哪里可以获得有关服务的信息以及在哪里获得。可接受性:许多人对向家人或朋友透露堕胎感到不舒服;他们报告说医疗保健提供者表现出不同程度的支持。可用性和适应性:区域参与者长途跋涉,面临长时间的等待,大流行限制加剧了这一问题。可负担性:参与者描述了支付服务、旅行和相关费用的经济压力。适宜性:大多数参与者期望得到有判断力的护理。经验差异很大:许多参与者与医疗保健人员的互动缺乏同理心、匆忙或有判断力,许多人也报告在同一护理途径上至少有一次没有判断力和支持性的互动。
堕胎寻求者在寻求护理时遇到了各种障碍。这些发现表明需要采取人口和系统层面的措施,例如:提供有关堕胎的准确信息并使其正常化;实施系统层面的策略以减少等待时间、旅行和成本,特别是针对农村人口;制定监管和质量改进举措,以增加劳动力及其提供高质量、非判断性堕胎护理的准备情况。在大流行限制期间寻求护理的挑战说明了在护理过程中以及在堕胎方式和服务类型之间提供社会支持的重要性。消费者的声音可以帮助了解堕胎护理的不同途径,并为克服获得性障碍的多维障碍提供解决方案。