Kemler Bryson R, Willier Donald P, D'Amore Taylor, Cohen Steven B, Dodson Christopher C, Ciccotti Michael G
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Phys Sportsmed. 2025 Apr;53(2):112-118. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2414462. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
Injuries to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are commonly reported in traditional overhead sports. Conversely, there is a lack of evidence outlining management and return to play (RTP) outcomes for gymnasts. This study aimed to evaluate RTP and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gymnasts after operative and non-operative treatment of UCL injuries.
Gymnasts who presented with UCL injury and underwent operative and non-operative treatment were evaluated. Patient reported outcomes were collected via telephone: Conway-Jobe Scale, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow (KJOC) Score, Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) Score, and quick DASH (qDASH) and Timmerman-Andrews (TA) Elbow Score.
Nine patients met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up. Five were initially treated operatively and four were initially treated non-operatively. The operative group initially consisted of three ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions (UCLR) and two UCL repairs with internal bracing. One patient crossed over to the operative group after failing non-operative treatment and underwent UCLR four months post injury. Overall, 66.7% and 100% of operatively and non-operatively treated gymnasts were able to return to play, respectively. At final follow-up, the operative groups' mean KJOC, MEP, TA, and qDASH scores were: 68.4 ± 7.7, 97.5 ± 2.7, 90.8 ± 10.7, and 1.9 ± 3.0, respectively. For the non-operative group, the mean scores were 67.4 ± 9.0, 71.7 ± 5.8, 71.7 ± 14.4, and 11.4 ± 9.9, respectively. Treatment satisfaction for the operative group was 81.7 ± 27.5 compared to 80.6 ± 34.5 in the non-operative group. Odds ratios indicated no differences between groups.
Both operative and non-operative interventions for UCL injuries in gymnasts can provide favorable outcomes with respect to return to play and subjective patient-reported outcomes. Further research is warranted to determine optimal treatment, especially regarding indications for operative vs. nonoperative treatment, of UCL injury based on injury severity and location in gymnasts.
Case series; Level III Evidence.
尺侧副韧带(UCL)损伤在传统的过头运动中较为常见。相反,目前缺乏关于体操运动员UCL损伤管理和重返比赛(RTP)结果的证据。本研究旨在评估体操运动员UCL损伤手术和非手术治疗后的RTP及患者报告结局(PROs)。
对出现UCL损伤并接受手术和非手术治疗的体操运动员进行评估。通过电话收集患者报告结局:康威 - 乔布量表、克伦 - 乔布骨科诊所肩肘(KJOC)评分、梅奥肘关节功能(MEP)评分、快速上肢功能障碍量表(qDASH)和蒂默曼 - 安德鲁斯(TA)肘关节评分。
9名患者符合纳入标准并可进行随访。5名患者最初接受手术治疗,4名患者最初接受非手术治疗。手术组最初包括3例尺侧副韧带重建(UCLR)和2例带内部支撑的UCL修复。1名患者非手术治疗失败后转至手术组,伤后4个月接受UCLR。总体而言,手术和非手术治疗的体操运动员分别有66.7%和100%能够重返比赛。在最后随访时,手术组的平均KJOC、MEP、TA和qDASH评分分别为:68.4±7.7、97.5±2.7、90.8±10.7和1.9±3.0。非手术组的平均评分分别为67.4±9.0、71.7±5.8、71.7±14.4和11.4±9.9。手术组的治疗满意度为81.7±27.5,非手术组为80.6±34.5。优势比表明两组之间无差异。
体操运动员UCL损伤的手术和非手术干预在重返比赛和患者主观报告结局方面均可提供良好的结果。有必要进一步研究以确定基于体操运动员损伤严重程度和部位的UCL损伤最佳治疗方法,特别是手术与非手术治疗的指征。
病例系列;三级证据。