Singh Apinderpreet, Chhabra Rajesh, Manogaran Ravi Sankar, Bethanbhatla Murali Krishna, Muraleedharan Manjul, Virk Ramandeep
Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Neurosurgery (Neuro otology), SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4056-4063. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04783-9. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
Endoscopic endonasal Trans-sphenoidal surgery for sellar-suprasellar tumors is considered the preferred route. The ideal instruments in skull base surgery should be able to manipulate adequately through the narrow corridors with effective tissue removal and bleeding control and reduce collateral damage to nearby vital structures. The present study sought to compare the nasal morbidity following transnasal sphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenoma using Coblation and Electrocautery. 160 undergoing Endoscopic TSS for non-functioning PAs were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into Coblation ( = 80) and electrocautery ( = 80) groups. All operations were performed by the same group of surgeons skilled in their surgical techniques. There were 59 and 53 patients with Knosp grade II tumors in the cautery and coblation group, respectively, while 21 and 27 patients had Knosp grade III tumors. The average duration of surgery using cautery was 96+/-4.5 min, while with coblation, the average time was 83+/-3.5 min, and the difference was statistically significant. Nasal crusting and granulation severity were observed more in the electrocautery group. The coblation group patients had clear surgical fields with few ooze points; the difference between the two groups was significant. Nasal synechiae and decreased nasal patency were common in the electrocautery group. There were no statistical differences in nasal bleeding, nasal deformity, or sense of smell parameters. Advanced medical tools like coblation are safe and effective for the dissection and ablation of the mucosa. They result in better intra-operative visualization and lesser postoperative nasal morbidity, which will help patients achieve a better quality of life.
经鼻内镜经蝶窦手术治疗鞍区-鞍上肿瘤被认为是首选途径。颅底手术中理想的器械应能够在狭窄通道中充分操作,有效切除组织并控制出血,减少对附近重要结构的附带损伤。本研究旨在比较使用低温等离子射频消融术和电灼术进行经鼻蝶窦垂体大腺瘤手术后的鼻腔并发症。160例接受内镜经蝶窦手术治疗无功能性垂体腺瘤的患者入组。患者被随机分为低温等离子射频消融术组(n = 80)和电灼术组(n = 80)。所有手术均由同一组手术技术熟练的外科医生进行。电灼术组和低温等离子射频消融术组分别有59例和53例Knosp II级肿瘤患者,21例和27例Knosp III级肿瘤患者。电灼术组的平均手术时间为96±4.5分钟,而低温等离子射频消融术组的平均时间为83±3.5分钟,差异具有统计学意义。电灼术组鼻腔结痂和肉芽组织严重程度更高。低温等离子射频消融术组患者手术视野清晰,渗血点少;两组之间差异显著。电灼术组鼻腔粘连和鼻通气减少较为常见。鼻腔出血、鼻畸形或嗅觉参数方面无统计学差异。像低温等离子射频消融术这样的先进医疗工具在黏膜剥离和消融方面安全有效。它们能带来更好的术中视野,术后鼻腔并发症更少,这将有助于患者获得更好的生活质量。