Zain Ahmad, Akram Muhammad Shariq, Ashfaq Fatima, Ans Armghan, Ans Hasaan H
Internal Medicine, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.
Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University (KEMU), Lahore, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 7;16(9):e68895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68895. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting postsynaptic membranes in neuromuscular junctions, presenting as fatigable muscle weakness. Myasthenic crisis is a life-threatening complication characterized by severe respiratory insufficiency necessitating invasive or noninvasive ventilation. Two rapid therapies used to manage myasthenic crises are intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and plasmapheresis (PLEX). Their comparative effectiveness remains equivocal. Our article examines evidence from several clinical trials and observational studies, in order to determine the superiority of one treatment over the other. Multiple factors can complicate the choices between two treatments. We concluded that the choice between PLEX and IVIg is multifaceted, guided by individual patient characteristics, institutional resources, and clinician preference. While PLEX can be considered as first-line for rapid clinical outcomes, it is hard to pick one treatment over the other, and careful consideration of comorbidities and resource availability is crucial. Our article highlights the need for further research to establish definitive guidelines and enhance patient outcomes in myasthenic crisis patients.
重症肌无力(MG)是一种自身免疫性疾病,会影响神经肌肉接头处的突触后膜,表现为易疲劳的肌肉无力。重症肌无力危象是一种危及生命的并发症,其特征为严重的呼吸功能不全,需要进行有创或无创通气。用于治疗重症肌无力危象的两种快速疗法是静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)和血浆置换(PLEX)。它们的相对疗效仍不明确。我们的文章研究了多项临床试验和观察性研究的证据,以确定一种治疗方法相对于另一种治疗方法的优越性。多种因素会使两种治疗方法之间的选择变得复杂。我们得出的结论是,PLEX和IVIg之间的选择是多方面的,受患者个体特征、机构资源和临床医生偏好的指导。虽然PLEX可被视为实现快速临床疗效的一线治疗方法,但很难在两者之间做出选择,仔细考虑合并症和资源可用性至关重要。我们的文章强调需要进一步研究,以建立明确的指南并改善重症肌无力危象患者的治疗效果。