• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性乳腺癌细胞块制备中的单细胞多重免疫细胞化学证实了GATA结合蛋白3比大囊性病液蛋白15和乳腺珠蛋白更敏感。

Single-cell multiplex immunocytochemistry in cell block preparations of metastatic breast cancer confirms sensitivity of GATA-binding protein 3 over gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and mammaglobin.

作者信息

Li Joshua J X, Cheng Hiu Yu, Lee Conrad H C, Ng Joanna K M, Tsang Julia Y, Tse Gary M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jan;133(1):e22910. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22910. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.22910
PMID:39377168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancers are frequently encountered in cytology and require immunocytochemistry (ICC). In this study, traditional and multiplex ICC (mICC) for GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15), and mammaglobin (MMG) were performed with the aim of validating mICC in cell blocks, with further single-cell expression pattern analysis to identify the single markers and combinations of markers most sensitive in subtypes of breast cancer.

METHODS

GATA3, GCDFP15, and MMG were paired with OptiView 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and Ventana DISCOVERY Purple and Blue, respectively, with cyclical and serial staining. Bright-field imaging was performed with the Mantra 2 system and analyzed with the inForm Tissue Finder (Akoya Biosciences). Cell detection and phenotyping were further confirmed by two pathologists.

RESULTS

In the 36 cases studied, traditional ICC and mICC demonstrated good concordance (kappa coefficient, >0.5; p < .01) at three cutoffs (1%, 5%, and 50%), except for GATA3 at the 1% cutoff. Single-marker positivity outnumbered double-marker positivity and the exceedingly rare triple-marker positivity (<3%). GATA3 was the leading single marker-positive phenotype in all breast cancer subtypes, except for MMG in estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (ER+/PR+/HER2+) breast cancers. Limited to two markers, GATA3/MMG included the greatest number of tumor cells for luminal breast cancers (ER+/PR+/HER2+, 60.6%; ER+/PR+/HER2+, 31.4%), whereas HER2-overexpressed breast cancers (27.4%) and triple-negative breast cancers (26.4%) favored the combination of GATA3/GCDFP15.

CONCLUSIONS

For a single marker, GATA3 displayed the highest sensitivity. The addition of MMG for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and GCDFP15 for hormone receptor-negative breast cancers further increased sensitivity. The low proportion of multimarker-positive cells suggested that the coexpression observed with traditional ICC is attributable to intratumoral heterogeneity, not genuine coexpression.

摘要

背景

转移性乳腺癌在细胞学检查中经常遇到,需要进行免疫细胞化学(ICC)检测。在本研究中,我们进行了针对GATA结合蛋白3(GATA3)、乳腺囊肿病液蛋白15(GCDFP15)和乳腺珠蛋白(MMG)的传统和多重ICC(mICC)检测,目的是验证细胞块中的mICC,并进一步进行单细胞表达模式分析,以确定在乳腺癌亚型中最敏感的单一标志物和标志物组合。

方法

GATA3、GCDFP15和MMG分别与OptiView 3,3'-二氨基联苯胺以及Ventana DISCOVERY Purple和Blue配对,进行循环和连续染色。使用Mantra 2系统进行明场成像,并使用inForm Tissue Finder(Akoya Biosciences)进行分析。细胞检测和表型分析由两名病理学家进一步确认。

结果

在研究的36例病例中,传统ICC和mICC在三个截断值(1%、5%和50%)下显示出良好的一致性(kappa系数>0.5;p<0.01),除了GATA3在1%截断值时。单标志物阳性的数量超过双标志物阳性,三标志物阳性极为罕见(<3%)。GATA3是所有乳腺癌亚型中主要的单标志物阳性表型,但雌激素受体阳性、孕激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阳性(ER+/PR+/HER2+)乳腺癌中的MMG除外。限于两种标志物时,GATA3/MMG在管腔型乳腺癌(ER+/PR+/HER2+,60.6%;ER+/PR+/HER2+,31.4%)中包含的肿瘤细胞数量最多,而HER2过表达乳腺癌(27.4%)和三阴性乳腺癌(26.4%)则倾向于GATA3/GCDFP15组合。

结论

对于单一标志物,GATA3显示出最高的敏感性。对于激素受体阳性乳腺癌添加MMG以及对于激素受体阴性乳腺癌添加GCDFP15进一步提高了敏感性。多标志物阳性细胞的比例较低表明,传统ICC观察到的共表达归因于肿瘤内异质性,而非真正的共表达。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/3c06dfb6a219/CNCY-133-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/6bff6996fc80/CNCY-133-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/a02891a66a89/CNCY-133-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/6cd29a858deb/CNCY-133-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/3c06dfb6a219/CNCY-133-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/6bff6996fc80/CNCY-133-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/a02891a66a89/CNCY-133-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/6cd29a858deb/CNCY-133-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a14/11695691/3c06dfb6a219/CNCY-133-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-cell multiplex immunocytochemistry in cell block preparations of metastatic breast cancer confirms sensitivity of GATA-binding protein 3 over gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and mammaglobin.转移性乳腺癌细胞块制备中的单细胞多重免疫细胞化学证实了GATA结合蛋白3比大囊性病液蛋白15和乳腺珠蛋白更敏感。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Jan;133(1):e22910. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22910. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
GATA3 expression in clinically useful groups of breast carcinoma: a comparison with GCDFP15 and mammaglobin for identifying paired primary and metastatic tumors.GATA3在临床实用型乳腺癌组中的表达:与GCDFP15和乳腺珠蛋白用于鉴别原发性和转移性配对肿瘤的比较
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2017 Feb;26:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
The Novel Marker GATA3 is Significantly More Sensitive Than Traditional Markers Mammaglobin and GCDFP15 for Identifying Breast Cancer in Surgical and Cytology Specimens of Metastatic and Matched Primary Tumors.新型标志物GATA3在识别转移性肿瘤及配对原发性肿瘤的手术和细胞学标本中的乳腺癌方面,比传统标志物乳腺珠蛋白和GCDFP15的敏感性显著更高。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016 Apr;24(4):229-37. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000186.
4
Characterisation of GATA3 expression in invasive breast cancer: differences in histological subtypes and immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes.浸润性乳腺癌中GATA3表达的特征:组织学亚型和免疫组化定义的分子亚型的差异
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Nov;70(11):926-934. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204137. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
5
GATA3: a promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens.GATA3:浆膜腔积液标本中转移性乳腺癌有前途的标志物。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Apr;122(4):307-12. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21393. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
6
Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens.GATA3免疫组化在细胞学标本中诊断转移性乳腺癌的应用价值。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Apr;43(4):271-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.23206. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
7
Can GATA3 Immunocytochemistry be Utilized as a Reliable Diagnostic Marker for Metastatic Breast Carcinoma in Cytological Materials? A Comparative Study with Mammaglobin and GCDFP-15 Expression.GATA3免疫细胞化学能否作为细胞学材料中转移性乳腺癌的可靠诊断标志物?与乳珠蛋白和GCDFP-15表达的比较研究。
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2018;34(2):143-149. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01419.
8
Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer.Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) 作为三阴性乳腺癌的敏感标志物。
Histopathology. 2020 Dec;77(6):936-948. doi: 10.1111/his.14118. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
SOX10, GATA3, GCDFP15, Androgen Receptor, and Mammaglobin for the Differential Diagnosis Between Triple-negative Breast Cancer and TTF1-negative Lung Adenocarcinoma.SOX10、GATA3、GCDFP15、雄激素受体和 Mammaglobin 用于鉴别三阴性乳腺癌与 TTF1 阴性肺腺癌。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Mar;43(3):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001216.
10
Utility of different immunostains for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinomas in both surgical and cytological specimens.不同免疫染色法在手术标本和细胞学标本中诊断转移性乳腺癌的效用
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2017 Oct;30:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
TRPS1 is a promising marker for all subtypes of breast cancer.TRPS1 是所有亚型乳腺癌的一个有前途的标志物。
Histopathology. 2024 Apr;84(5):822-836. doi: 10.1111/his.15126. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
2
Immunocytochemical markers, molecular testing and digital cytopathology for aspiration cytology of metastatic breast carcinoma.免疫细胞化学标志物、分子检测和数字细胞病理学在转移性乳腺癌细针抽吸细胞学中的应用。
Cytopathology. 2024 Mar;35(2):218-225. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13333. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Mammaglobin-A Expression Is Highly Specific for Tumors Derived from the Breast, the Female Genital Tract, and the Salivary Gland.
乳腺珠蛋白-A表达对源自乳腺、女性生殖道和唾液腺的肿瘤具有高度特异性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(6):1202. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061202.
4
Anatomical site and size of sentinel lymph node metastasis predicted additional axillary tumour burden and breast cancer survival.前哨淋巴结转移的解剖部位和大小可预测腋窝额外肿瘤负荷及乳腺癌生存率。
Histopathology. 2023 May;82(6):899-911. doi: 10.1111/his.14875. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy in 3026 pleural biopsies and matched pleural effusion cytology with clinical correlation.3026 例胸膜活检与配对胸腔积液细胞学检查的诊断准确性比较研究,并与临床相关性进行比较。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1471-1481. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5038. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
Immunocytochemistry of effusion fluids: Introduction to SCIP approach.积液的免疫细胞化学:SCIP方法介绍
Cytojournal. 2022 Jan 31;19:3. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_05_2021. eCollection 2022.
7
Second CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) titled "Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Serous Fluids" (second edition).第二本CMAS(《细胞病理学杂志专论/图谱系列》),名为《浆液性体液的细胞病理学诊断》(第二版)。
Cytojournal. 2022 Mar 21;19:19. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_00_2021. eCollection 2022.
8
The role of cytokeratin 7/20 coordination revisited-Machine learning identifies improved interpretative algorithms for cell block immunohistochemistry in aspirates of metastatic carcinoma.再次探讨细胞角蛋白 7/20 协调性的作用——机器学习为转移性癌细针吸取细胞块免疫组化的解释算法提供了改进。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Jun;130(6):455-468. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22559. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
9
Combined SOX10 GATA3 is most sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic breast cancers: a comparative study of breast markers in multiple tumors.联合检测 SOX10 和 GATA3 对原发性和转移性乳腺癌最敏感:多种肿瘤中乳腺标志物的比较研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05818-9. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
10
Axillary Nodal Metastasis with Papillary Morphology: An Uncommon Origin.具有乳头形态的腋窝淋巴结转移:一种罕见的起源。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(6):612-616. doi: 10.1159/000508241. Epub 2020 Jun 11.