Center for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 8;47(1):751. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03012-9.
This letter to the editor examines the recent comparative study by Santos et al. (2024) on transciliary supraorbital (TCA) and transpalpebral (TPA) approaches for skull base access. The original article offers valuable insights into the anatomical distinctions and potential clinical applications of each approach. The letter praises the methodical analysis presented in the study while proposing future directions incorporating advanced imaging technologies and expanded clinical trials to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. Additionally, it suggests integrating longitudinal studies to evaluate patient outcomes, thereby refining the procedural choice based on specific clinical scenarios.
这封给编辑的信探讨了 Santos 等人最近(2024 年)关于经眶上嵴(TCA)和经眼睑(TPA)入路用于颅底入路的比较研究。原始文章深入探讨了每种方法的解剖学差异和潜在临床应用。该信赞扬了研究中呈现的系统分析,并提出了未来的方向,包括结合先进的成像技术和扩大临床试验,以提高手术精度和结果。此外,它还建议纳入纵向研究来评估患者的结果,从而根据特定的临床情况改进手术方法的选择。