Anderson Thomas S, Hattersley Rachel D, Demetriou Jackie L
Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK.
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Vet Surg. 2025 Feb;54(2):345-353. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14160. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
To compare the effectiveness of a modified surface gelatin sponge to a plain collagen sponge for hemostasis of parenchymal hepatic bleeding.
Prospective, randomized trial of two hemostatic agents.
A total of 45 dogs undergoing elective liver surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: 22 in the adhesive gelatin (AG) group and 23 in the plain collagen (PC) group. A total of 20 patients per group underwent liver biopsy to create a uniformly sized bleeding surface, with the remaining patients (AG = 2, PC = 3) undergoing liver lobectomy.
Evaluation of hemostatic effectiveness and tissue adhesion of each sponge type was performed by the operating surgeon using structured scoring systems. Hemostatic parameters were primarily evaluated at the liver biopsy site to maintain homogeneity of bleeding surface size.
For the liver biopsy group (n = 40), 5 min after hemostatic sponge application, 10/20 dogs were bleeding in the PC group, compared to 2/20 in AG group (p = .0138). The PC bleeding was significantly higher than AG across the 3 to 6 min evaluation period (p < .001). When surgeons tested the adhesion of the sponge across the whole cohort (n = 45), AG scored 2 (of 3) against 1 for PC (p < .001). In group PC, 5/23 sponges dislodged during abdominal lavage and preparations for closure and had to be replaced due to recurrence of bleeding, compared with no AG sponges dislodging (p = .042). There were no further complications related to the use of either sponge.
In the dogs with hepatic parenchymal incision, use of an adhesive gelatin sponge improved intraoperative attachment and haemostatic effectiveness, compared to a collagen sponge.
Based on our clinical experience in these cases, adhesive gelatin sponges could be considered an effective option when selecting a hemostatic agent for liver surgery in dogs.
比较改良表面明胶海绵与普通胶原海绵对肝实质出血的止血效果。
两种止血剂的前瞻性随机试验。
总共45只接受择期肝脏手术的犬被随机分为两组:22只在粘性明胶(AG)组,23只在普通胶原(PC)组。每组20只患者接受肝活检以创建大小均匀的出血表面,其余患者(AG = 2,PC = 3)接受肝叶切除术。
手术医生使用结构化评分系统评估每种海绵类型的止血效果和组织粘附情况。主要在肝活检部位评估止血参数,以保持出血表面大小的一致性。
对于肝活检组(n = 40),应用止血海绵5分钟后,PC组20只犬中有10只出血,而AG组为2/20(p = 0.0138)。在3至6分钟的评估期内,PC组的出血明显高于AG组(p < 0.001)。当外科医生在整个队列(n = 45)中测试海绵的粘附力时,AG得分为2(满分3分),而PC得分为1(p < 0.001)。在PC组中,23只海绵中有5只在腹腔灌洗和关闭准备过程中移位,由于出血复发而不得不更换,而AG组没有海绵移位(p = 0.042)。使用这两种海绵均未出现进一步的并发症。
在肝实质切开的犬中,与胶原海绵相比,使用粘性明胶海绵可改善术中附着和止血效果。
基于我们在这些病例中的临床经验,在为犬肝脏手术选择止血剂时,粘性明胶海绵可被视为一种有效的选择。