Kim Do-Hoon, Théberge Valerie, Parpia Sameer, Kong Iwa, Provencher Sawyna, Yassa Michael, Perera Francisco, Lavertu Sophie, Rousseau Pierre, Lee Justin, Karam Irene, Schneider Kenneth, Levine Mark N, Whelan Timothy J
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec (CHUQ)-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 10;43(5):505-512. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00600. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
Previous studies suggest that external-beam partial breast irradiation (PBI) delivered twice a day can lead to increased adverse cosmesis (AC). The objective of our trial was to determine whether two regimens for PBI given once daily over 1 week resulted in acceptable AC to inform a phase III trial.
Patients age ≥50 years with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, ≤3 cm in size treated by lumpectomy with negative axillary nodes were randomly assigned to external-beam PBI of 30 Gy or 27.5 Gy, each given in five fractions once daily. The primary outcome was AC (fair or poor) by photographic assessment at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included AC assessed by nurse at 2 years, by patient self-assessment at 3 years, and late toxicity. On the basis of a 17% risk of AC with whole-breast irradiation, the upper bound of a two-sided 90% CI, 23% was set as the tolerance margin (OPAR, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02637024).
In total, 142 patients were randomly assigned to 30 Gy and 139 to 27.5 Gy. The median follow-up was 5 years. The mean age was 65 years, and the mean tumor size was 1.2 cm. Both schedules met acceptability criteria by photographic assessment (AC, 12.1% [90% CI, 8.2 to 17.6] for 30 Gy and 15.2% [90% CI, 10.8 to 21.1] for 27.5 Gy) and by nurse assessment. AC by patient self-assessment exceeded the 90% CI for the 30 Gy regimen. At 5 years, 16 (11.3%, 90% CI, 7.6 to 16.4) patients treated with 30 Gy and eight (5.8%, 90% CI, 3.3 to 9.9) patients treated with 27.5 Gy were observed to have grade 2 or more late toxicity.
According to the study design, 30 Gy and 27.5 Gy resulted in acceptable cosmetic outcomes. In light of recent studies, a lower dose was chosen for the phase III trial.
既往研究表明,每天两次进行的外照射部分乳腺放疗(PBI)会导致不良美容效果(AC)增加。我们试验的目的是确定两种每周一次的PBI方案是否能产生可接受的AC,以为III期试验提供依据。
年龄≥50岁、患有浸润性乳腺癌或原位导管癌、肿瘤大小≤3 cm且接受保乳手术且腋窝淋巴结阴性的患者,被随机分配接受30 Gy或27.5 Gy的外照射PBI,均为每日一次,分五剂给予。主要结局是2年时通过照片评估的AC(一般或差)。次要结局包括2年时护士评估的AC、3年时患者自我评估的AC以及晚期毒性。基于全乳放疗时AC风险为17%,将双侧90%置信区间的上限23%设定为耐受界限(OPAR,ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02637024)。
总共142例患者被随机分配至30 Gy组,139例被分配至27.5 Gy组。中位随访时间为5年。平均年龄为65岁,平均肿瘤大小为1.2 cm。两种方案通过照片评估(30 Gy组AC为12.1%[90%置信区间,8.2%至17.6%],27.5 Gy组为15.2%[90%置信区间,10.8%至21.1%])和护士评估均达到可接受标准。患者自我评估的30 Gy方案的AC超过了90%置信区间。5年时,观察到16例(11.3%,90%置信区间,7.6%至16.4%)接受30 Gy治疗的患者和8例(5.8%,90%置信区间,3.3%至9.9%)接受27.5 Gy治疗的患者出现2级或更高级别的晚期毒性。
根据研究设计,30 Gy和27.5 Gy产生了可接受的美容效果。鉴于近期的研究,III期试验选择了较低剂量。