• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领域特定的元认知自我信念更新。

Domain-specific updating of metacognitive self-beliefs.

机构信息

Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Building 1710, Universitetsbyen 3, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.

Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Building 1710, Universitetsbyen 3, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark; Cambridge Psychiatry, Cambridge University, UK.

出版信息

Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105965. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105965. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105965
PMID:39378768
Abstract

Metacognitive self-monitoring is thought to be largely domain-general, with numerous prior studies providing evidence of a metacognitive g-factor. The observation of shared inter-individual variance across different measures of metacognition does not however preclude the possibility that some aspects may nevertheless be domain-specific. In particular, it is unknown the degree to which explicit metacognitive beliefs regarding one's own abilities may exhibit domain generality. Similarly, little is known about how such prior self-beliefs are maintained and updated in the face of new metacognitive experiences. In this study of 330 healthy individuals, we explored metacognitive belief updating across memory, visual, and general knowledge domains spanning nutritional and socioeconomic facts. We find that across all domains, participants strongly reduced their self-belief (i.e., expressed less confidence in their abilities) after completing a multi-domain metacognition test battery. Using psychological network and cross-correlation analyses, we further found that while metacognitive confidence exhibited strong domain generality, metacognitive belief updating was highly domain-specific, such that participants shifted their confidence specifically according to their performance on each domain. Overall, our findings suggest that metacognitive experiences prompt a shift in self-priors from a more general to a more specific focus.

摘要

元认知自我监测被认为在很大程度上是领域普遍的,许多先前的研究提供了元认知 g 因素的证据。然而,观察到不同元认知测量之间存在共同的个体间方差,并不能排除某些方面可能仍然是特定于领域的可能性。特别是,对于一个人自身能力的元认知信念在多大程度上表现出领域普遍性,目前还不得而知。同样,对于在面对新的元认知体验时,这些先前的自我信念是如何被维持和更新的,也知之甚少。在这项对 330 名健康个体的研究中,我们探索了记忆、视觉和一般知识领域(包括营养和社会经济事实)的元认知信念更新。我们发现,在所有领域中,参与者在完成多领域元认知测试后,强烈降低了他们的自我信念(即,对自己的能力表示不太自信)。使用心理网络和互相关分析,我们进一步发现,虽然元认知信心表现出很强的领域普遍性,但元认知信念更新是高度特定于领域的,即参与者根据每个领域的表现具体地调整他们的信心。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,元认知体验促使自我优先从更一般的关注转移到更具体的关注。

相似文献

1
Domain-specific updating of metacognitive self-beliefs.领域特定的元认知自我信念更新。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105965. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105965. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
3
Metacognitive beliefs in epilepsy: What is their contribution to quality of life in the context of anxiety, depression and cognitive functioning?癫痫中的元认知信念:在焦虑、抑郁和认知功能背景下,它们对生活质量有何影响?
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110356. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110356. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
4
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.近期诊断的双相情感障碍患者的元认知知识与体验
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;38(7):730-44. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1161733. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Domain-General and Domain-Specific Patterns of Activity Supporting Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex.支持人类前额叶皮层元认知的域普遍和域特定活动模式。
J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 4;38(14):3534-3546. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-17.2018. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Breaking the cycle: Exploring the relationship of metacognition beliefs, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and psychosocial performance among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.打破循环:探索被诊断为精神分裂症的个体的元认知信念、强迫症状与社会心理表现之间的关系。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;32(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13086. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
8
Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.元认知是否存在 G 因素?跨任务回溯性元认知敏感性的相关性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Sep;149(9):1788-1799. doi: 10.1037/xge0000746. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.跨领域的人类元认知:来自个体差异和神经成像的见解
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.16. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
Correlated individual differences suggest a common mechanism underlying metacognition in visual perception and visual short-term memory.相关个体差异表明,在视觉感知和视觉短期记忆中,元认知存在一个共同的机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2035.