Suppr超能文献

农田系统中新 SDHI 杀菌剂的生态安全阈值推导和风险评估。

Derivation of ecological safety thresholds and risk assessment of new SDHI fungicides in farmland system.

机构信息

School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 100083 Beijing, China.

Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 1;954:176773. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176773. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides have become some of the top-selling fungicides in recent years. As the utilization of these fungicides intensifies, the corresponding potential risks to the environment proportionately increase. However, there is still limited knowledge about their toxic effects on ecosystems. In this study, acute toxicity data from laboratory assessments of the springtail Folsomia candida, alongside collected data from terrestrial and aquatic non-target species, were utilized to construct a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model for both terrestrial and aquatic non-target organisms. Subsequently, we derived ecological baseline values for diverse scenarios within ecosystems. The results indicated that benzovindiflupyr exhibited the highest 7-day median lethal concentration (7d-LC) to Folsomia candida at 2.0 μg cm, while the toxicity levels of other SDHI fungicides varied, ranging from 99 to 304 μg cm. In agricultural environments, the Hazard Concentration for 5 % of species (HC) values for fluxapyroxad, boscalid, sedaxane, and isopyrazam were determined to be 8.0, 1240, 12.97, and 25.37 g ha, respectively. In aquatic environments, the HC values for benzovindiflupyr, fluxapyroxad, boscalid, sedaxane, isopyrazam, and carboxin were 0.0013, 0.022, 1.76, 0.372, 0.013, and 0.161 mg L, respectively. In an evaluation of typical agricultural scenarios within China, SDHI fungicides were found to exert substantial ecological risks to terrestrial non-target fauna and aquatic ecosystems around agricultural fields. Specifically, isopyrazam and fluxapyroxad were identified as posing heightened ecological risks to Typhlodromus pyri and Aphidius rhopalosiphi. Moreover, the application of benzovindiflupyr, carboxin, isopyrazam, and fluxapyroxad in paddy field environments is associated with unacceptable risks to groundwater. The findings of this study contribute significantly to the environmental risk evaluation of SDHI fungicides within farmland system, thereby informing the development of policy frameworks for their scientifically grounded application.

摘要

琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂(SDHI)类杀菌剂近年来已成为销售额最高的杀菌剂之一。随着这些杀菌剂的使用日益增加,相应的环境潜在风险也成比例增加。然而,关于它们对生态系统的毒性影响,我们的了解仍然有限。在本研究中,我们利用实验室评估跳虫 Folsomia candida 的急性毒性数据,以及从陆地和水生非靶标物种收集的数据,构建了陆地和水生非靶标生物的物种敏感性分布(SSD)模型。随后,我们为生态系统内的不同情景推导了生态基线值。结果表明,苯并呋氟草酮对跳虫 Folsomia candida 的 7 天中值致死浓度(7d-LC)最高,为 2.0μg/cm,而其他 SDHI 类杀菌剂的毒性水平则在 99 到 304μg/cm 之间变化。在农业环境中,测定了氟吡菌酰胺、肟菌酯、噻唑膦和异恶唑草酮的 5%物种危害浓度(HC)值分别为 8.0、1240、12.97 和 25.37g/ha。在水生环境中,苯并呋氟草酮、氟吡菌酰胺、肟菌酯、噻唑膦、异恶唑草酮和丁硫克百威的 HC 值分别为 0.0013、0.022、1.76、0.372、0.013 和 0.161mg/L。在中国典型农业情景的评估中,SDHI 类杀菌剂对农田周围的陆地非靶标动物和水生生态系统造成了实质性的生态风险。具体而言,异恶唑草酮和氟吡菌酰胺被认为对山楂叶螨和烟粉虱具有更高的生态风险。此外,苯并呋氟草酮、丁硫克百威、异恶唑草酮和氟吡菌酰胺在稻田环境中的应用与地下水不可接受的风险有关。本研究的结果为农田系统中 SDHI 类杀菌剂的环境风险评估提供了重要依据,为其科学应用的政策框架制定提供了信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验