Department of Perinatal Health, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, CP 62100, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73914-7.
With global C-section rates rising, understanding potential consequences is imperative. Previous studies suggested links between birth mode and psychological outcomes. This study evaluates the association of birth mode and neurodevelopment in young children across two prospective cohorts, using repeated psychometric assessments. Data from the ELEMENT (Early Life Exposures in Mexico to Environmental Toxicants) and PROGRESS (Programming Research in Obesity, Growth, and Environment and Social Stress) cohorts, comprising 7158 and 2202 observations of 1402 children aged 2 to 36 months, and 726 children aged 5 to 27 months, respectively, were analyzed. Exclusion criteria for the cohorts were maternal diseases such as preeclampsia, renal or heart disease, gestational diabetes, and epilepsy. Neurodevelopment was gauged via Bayley's Scales of Infant Development: 2nd edition for ELEMENT and 3rd edition for PROGRESS. Mixed-effects models longitudinally estimated associations between birth mode and neurodevelopment scores, adjusting for cofounders. In ELEMENT, psychomotor development composite scores were significantly affected by birth mode from ages 2 to 8 months; the largest estimate within this range was at 2 months (β =-1.93; 95% CI: [-3.64, -0.22], reference: vaginal delivery). For PROGRESS, a negative association was found with motor development composite scores over all the studied age range (β=-1.91; 95% CI: [-3.01, -0.81]). The association was stronger between ages 6 to 18 months, with the strongest estimate at 11 months (β=-2.58; 95% CI: [-4.37, -0.74]). A negative impact of C-section on language scores in girls was estimated for the PROGRESS cohort (β=-1.92; 95% CI: [-3.57, -0.27]), most marked in ages 22 to 25 months (largest β at 24.5 months=-3.04; 95% CI: [-5.79, -0.30]). Children born by C-section showed lower motor and language development scores during specific age windows in the first three years of life. Further research is necessary to understand the complexities and implications of these findings.
随着全球剖宫产率的上升,了解其潜在后果至关重要。先前的研究表明分娩方式与心理结果之间存在关联。本研究使用重复的心理评估,评估了在两个前瞻性队列中分娩方式与幼儿神经发育之间的关联,该研究纳入了 ELEMENT(墨西哥环境毒物暴露早期生活研究)和 PROGRESS(肥胖、生长和环境与社会应激研究计划)队列的数据,共纳入了 7158 次和 2202 次 1402 名 2 至 36 月龄儿童和 726 名 5 至 27 月龄儿童的观察结果。这两个队列的排除标准是产妇患有子痫前期、肾脏或心脏疾病、妊娠期糖尿病和癫痫等疾病。神经发育通过 ELEMENT 的贝利婴幼儿发展量表第二版和 PROGRESS 的第三版进行评估。混合效应模型纵向估计了分娩方式与神经发育评分之间的关联,同时调整了混杂因素。在 ELEMENT 中,从 2 至 8 月龄时,心理运动发育综合评分受到分娩方式的显著影响;该范围内最大的估计值出现在 2 月龄(β=-1.93;95%CI:[-3.64,-0.22],参考值:阴道分娩)。对于 PROGRESS,在整个研究年龄范围内,运动发育综合评分与剖宫产呈负相关(β=-1.91;95%CI:[-3.01,-0.81])。6 至 18 月龄之间的关联更强,11 月龄时的估计值最强(β=-2.58;95%CI:[-4.37,-0.74])。PROGRESS 队列中估计剖宫产对女孩语言评分有负面影响(β=-1.92;95%CI:[-3.57,-0.27]),在 22 至 25 月龄时最为明显(最大β值在 24.5 月龄时为-3.04;95%CI:[-5.79,-0.30])。在生命的头三年中,特定年龄窗口内剖宫产出生的儿童运动和语言发育评分较低。需要进一步研究以了解这些发现的复杂性和影响。