Mistry Akshitkumar M
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, 220 Abraham Flexner Way, 15th Floor, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):715-721. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02139-3. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
Administering intravenous fluids is a common therapy for critically ill patients. Isotonic crystalloid solutions, such as saline or balanced solutions, are frequently used for intravenous fluid therapy. The choice between saline or a balanced crystalloid has been a significant question in critical care medicine. Recent large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated whether balanced crystalloids yield better outcomes in general or specific critical care populations, and many of them have confirmed this hypothesis. Although the broad eligibility criteria of these RCTs suggest applicability to neurocritical care patients, it is important to discuss whether using balanced crystalloids, as opposed to saline, would benefit patients who primarily have neurological disorders or diseases. This review considers the relevance of this question, weighs the pros and cons of the two fluid types, examines available data, and anticipates results from ongoing RCTs to guide clinicians in selecting the optimal fluid for patients with brain injury.
静脉输液是危重症患者常用的治疗方法。等渗晶体溶液,如生理盐水或平衡溶液,常用于静脉输液治疗。在生理盐水和平衡晶体溶液之间做出选择一直是重症医学中的一个重要问题。最近的大型随机对照试验(RCT)研究了平衡晶体溶液在一般或特定重症监护人群中是否能产生更好的结果,其中许多试验证实了这一假设。尽管这些RCT广泛的纳入标准表明适用于神经重症监护患者,但讨论使用平衡晶体溶液而非生理盐水是否会使主要患有神经系统疾病的患者受益很重要。本综述考虑了这个问题的相关性,权衡了两种液体类型的利弊,审查了现有数据,并预测正在进行的RCT的结果,以指导临床医生为脑损伤患者选择最佳液体。