Suppr超能文献

弹道性神经损伤:证据现状及基于经验的患者治疗方法

Ballistic Nerve Injuries: State of the Evidence and Approach to the Patient Based on Experience.

作者信息

Stepan Jeffrey G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Mar 25;6(5):743-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.021. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Nerve injuries secondary to gunshot wounds (GSWs) have been traditionally thought of as neurapraxic injuries with high likelihood of complete recovery. A review of the literature, however, highlights the misconceptions surrounding ballistic nerve injuries and their treatments. Contrary to this accepted dogma, approximately 30% to 60% of GSWs to the upper extremity may result in nerve injury requiring repair or reconstruction. Surgical exploration following ballistic injury reveals that 20% to 55% of nerves were lacerated requiring repair or grafting. Despite these numbers, outcomes after nerve repair or grafting are limited, and the limited data show evidence of poor functional recovery. In our experience, delayed exploration of GSW-related nerve injuries in patients without signs of functional recovery demonstrate large neuromas in continuity often requiring meticulous dissection and excision with resulting large gaps that require reconstruction. This has led us to explore options to identify patients with nerve deficits after GSWs who may benefit from earlier exploration. Others advocate for the exploration of all ballistic nerve injuries, which would represent a logistical challenge in high volume centers and may lead to unnecessary explorations of in continuity nerves. To facilitate identification of nerve injury following GSWs, we have explored the utilization of early ultrasound to identify patients with nerve lacerations that may benefit from early exploration (1-2 weeks after injury). Earlier exploration can lead to less technically challenging surgery, shorter nerve gaps, and more time for the nerve to recover. Herein, we present a series of cases to help illustrate this approach to the patient. Although early exploration and repair versus grafting of nerves may have benefits as outlined above, there are little to no data on outcomes of nerve repair or grafting in ballistic injuries in the more acute setting, 1 to 2 weeks after injury. Further research is needed both with regards to diagnosis and utilization of ultrasound, as well as postoperative outcomes in patients with ballistic nerve injuries to help guide our ever-evolving treatment protocols.

摘要

传统上认为,枪伤(GSW)继发的神经损伤属于神经失用性损伤,完全恢复的可能性很大。然而,文献综述凸显了围绕弹道性神经损伤及其治疗的误解。与这种公认的教条相反,上肢枪伤中约30%至60%可能导致需要修复或重建的神经损伤。弹道损伤后的手术探查显示,20%至55%的神经发生撕裂,需要修复或移植。尽管有这些数据,但神经修复或移植后的结果有限,而且有限的数据显示功能恢复不佳。根据我们的经验,对没有功能恢复迹象的枪伤相关神经损伤患者进行延迟探查时,常发现连续的大神经瘤,往往需要细致的解剖和切除,结果会产生需要重建的大间隙。这促使我们探索各种方法,以识别枪伤后可能从早期探查中获益的神经功能缺损患者。其他人主张对所有弹道性神经损伤进行探查,这在高流量中心将是一个后勤挑战,可能导致对连续神经进行不必要的探查。为便于识别枪伤后的神经损伤,我们探索了利用早期超声来识别可能从早期探查(受伤后1至2周)中获益的神经撕裂患者。早期探查可使手术的技术难度降低、神经间隙缩短,以及为神经恢复留出更多时间。在此,我们展示一系列病例以帮助说明针对此类患者的这种方法。尽管如上文所述,早期探查以及神经修复与移植可能有好处,但在受伤后1至2周这个更急性期的弹道损伤中,几乎没有关于神经修复或移植结果的数据。在超声的诊断和应用以及弹道性神经损伤患者的术后结果方面都需要进一步研究,以帮助指导我们不断发展的治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb36/11456629/7a78e486dfdf/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验