Suppr超能文献

布比卡因鞘内注射联合芬太尼与布比卡因鞘内注射联合咪达唑仑用于下腹部及下肢手术的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Midazolam in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries.

作者信息

Bhatia Jayant, Suryawanshi Chhaya

机构信息

Anaesthesiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 7;16(9):e68908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68908. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Many different adjuvants are added intrathecally along with local anaesthetics to prolong intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Hence, this study aimed to compare intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl and bupivacaine with midazolam in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Following permission from the Hospital Ethical Committee (Research Protocol No.: IESC/PGS/2022/143), the study was conducted on a sample of 60 patients, divided into two groups, Group F and Group M, with 30 patients each, representing the American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grades I and II. The patients were between the ages of 18 and 60 and featured both males and females, scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures on the lower abdomen and lower limbs via spinal anaesthesia. Group "F": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (25 mcg) of fentanyl (preservative-free) intrathecally. Group "M": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) of midazolam (preservative-free) intrathecally. The primary aim was to study the onset of motor and sensory block and duration of analgesia with the addition of midazolam or fentanyl to 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in the sub-arachnoid block. A secondary aim was to evaluate the quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, determine the haemodynamic stability in the intraoperative and postoperative period in the two study groups, and observe any adverse effects of study drugs. Group F exhibited a substantially longer duration for both sensory (211.5 vs. 154.4 min) and motor blockade (269.8 vs. 214.6 min) compared to Group M, as well as a rapid onset time for both sensory (2.6 vs. 3.3 min) and motor blockade (3.1 vs. 3.9 min). Also, Group F had a significantly longer duration of effective analgesia compared to Group M (266 ± 15.9 vs. 197.6 ± 13.7 minutes). The addition of 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) Midazolam with 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally prolonged the duration of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia; however, fentanyl 0.5 ml (25 mcg) has a more prolonged duration of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

摘要

许多不同的佐剂与局部麻醉药一起鞘内注射,以延长术中和术后镇痛时间。因此,本研究旨在比较鞘内注射布比卡因加芬太尼与布比卡因加咪达唑仑在下腹部和下肢手术中的效果。经医院伦理委员会批准(研究方案编号:IESC/PGS/2022/143),本研究对60例患者进行了抽样,分为两组,F组和M组,每组30例,均为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级和II级。患者年龄在18至60岁之间,男女皆有,计划通过脊髓麻醉进行下腹部和下肢的择期手术。F组:鞘内注射3 ml 0.5%的盐酸重比重布比卡因加0.5 ml(25 mcg)芬太尼(无防腐剂)。M组:鞘内注射3 ml 0.5%的盐酸重比重布比卡因加0.5 ml(2.5 mg)咪达唑仑(无防腐剂)。主要目的是研究在蛛网膜下腔阻滞中,0.5%重比重布比卡因添加咪达唑仑或芬太尼后的运动和感觉阻滞起效时间及镇痛持续时间。次要目的是评估麻醉质量和术后镇痛效果,确定两个研究组术中和术后的血流动力学稳定性,并观察研究药物的任何不良反应。与M组相比,F组的感觉阻滞(211.5分钟对vs。154.4分钟)和运动阻滞(269.8分钟对vs。214.6分钟)持续时间显著更长,感觉阻滞(2.6分钟对vs。3.3分钟)和运动阻滞(3.1分钟对vs。3.9分钟)的起效时间也更快。此外,F组的有效镇痛持续时间也显著长于M组(266±15.9分钟对vs。197.6±13.7分钟)。鞘内注射0.5 ml(2.5 mg)咪达唑仑与0.5%重比重布比卡因可延长麻醉和术后镇痛时间;然而,0.5 ml(25 mcg)芬太尼的术中和术后镇痛持续时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdef/11459076/769ca93f029e/cureus-0016-00000068908-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验