Suppr超能文献

接受全人工心脏与持续性双心室辅助装置支持的患者在等待名单和移植后结果的比较。

Comparison of waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in patients supported with total artificial heart versus continuous biventricular assist devices.

作者信息

Ferrall Joel, Vaidya Ajay S, Kawaguchi Eric S, Patel Sanjeet G, Lee Raymond C, Lee Emily S, Wolfson Aaron M

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Department of Anthropology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2025 Feb;49(2):281-291. doi: 10.1111/aor.14884. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Durable biventricular support may be necessary to bridge patients with end-stage biventricular failure to heart transplantation. This study compares waitlist and post-transplant outcomes between patients supported with continuous flow, durable biventricular assist devices (BiVAD), and total artificial heart (TAH).

METHODS

Using the UNOS registry, we analyzed adult (≥18 years old), first-time transplant candidates with TAH or BiVAD at the time of listing or transplantation from 10/1/2010-10/31/2020, with follow-up through 3/31/2022. Multivariable proportional subdistribution hazards models and cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare death/deterioration or heart transplantation on the waitlist between cohorts. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate one-year post-transplant survival and evaluate difference in outcomes based on annual transplant center volume.

RESULTS

The waitlist cohort included a total of 228 patients (25% BiVAD). Waitlist outcomes between device types were similar. The transplanted cohort included a total of 352 patients (25% BiVAD). There was a trend towards worse one-year post-transplant survival in patients bridged with TAH versus BiVAD (log-rank p-value = 0.072) that persisted after adjusting for age, gender, policy, and removing dual-organ recipients (HR 1.94 (0.94, 3.98) p-value = 0.07). There was a difference in one-year post-transplant survival amongst TAH-bridged patients when stratified by annual transplant center volume (log-rank p-value = 0.013). One-year post-transplant survival between TAH-supported patients from high annual transplant volume centers and BiVAD-supported patients was similar (p-value = 0.815).

CONCLUSIONS

BiVAD and TAH are reasonable support strategies with TAH implantation at high-volume transplant centers (51+ transplants/year) having similar 1-year post-transplant survival to BiVAD-supported patients.

摘要

背景

对于终末期双心室衰竭患者,可能需要持久的双心室支持以过渡到心脏移植。本研究比较了接受持续血流、持久双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)和全人工心脏(TAH)支持的患者在等待名单上的情况以及移植后的结局。

方法

利用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记系统,我们分析了2010年10月1日至2020年10月31日期间在列入名单或移植时使用TAH或BiVAD的成年(≥18岁)首次移植候选者,并随访至2022年3月31日。使用多变量比例子分布风险模型和特定病因的Cox比例风险模型来比较队列之间在等待名单上的死亡/病情恶化或心脏移植情况。使用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险模型来评估移植后一年的生存率,并根据年度移植中心手术量评估结局差异。

结果

等待名单队列共有228例患者(25%为BiVAD)。不同装置类型在等待名单上的结局相似。移植队列共有352例患者(25%为BiVAD)。与BiVAD相比,接受TAH过渡的患者移植后一年生存率有变差的趋势(对数秩检验p值 = 0.072),在调整年龄、性别、政策并排除双器官受者后该趋势仍然存在(风险比1.94(0.94,3.98),p值 = 0.07)。根据年度移植中心手术量分层时,TAH过渡患者的移植后一年生存率存在差异(对数秩检验p值 = 0.013)。来自高年度移植量中心的TAH支持患者与BiVAD支持患者的移植后一年生存率相似(p值 = 0.815)。

结论

BiVAD和TAH都是合理的支持策略,在高手术量移植中心(每年51例以上移植手术)植入TAH的患者移植后一年生存率与BiVAD支持的患者相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验