Lumen Nicolaas, Wang Zeyu, Waterschoot Mieke, Tailly Thomas, Turchi Beatrice, Verla Wesley
Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium -
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05872-5.
The aim of this study was to describe the technique and initial outcomes of robot-assisted T-plasty for recalcitrant bladder neck stenosis.
Patients who underwent robot-assisted T-plasty for recalcitrant bladder neck stenosis in a single center were included. Presence of bladder neck stenosis was preoperatively confirmed by the combination of retrograde urethrography with voiding cysto-urethrography and flexible urethroscopy. Follow-up visits were performed with history taking, uroflowmetry and echographic residual urine measurement. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients without urinary symptoms and with a maximum uroflow of no less than 15mL/s were considered as successfully treated. Otherwise, cystoscopy would be performed, and recurrence was defined as the inability to pass a 14 French cystoscope through the bladder neck.
Since 2018, seven patients were treated. The etiologies were transurethral resection of the prostate and simple prostatectomy in respectively 6 patients and 1 patient. Cystoscopy was able to diagnose bladder neck stenosis in all cases whereas urethrography was equivocal in 3 out of 7 cases. Median (range) age at surgery was 60 (54-75) years, and median number of prior endoscopic treatment for bladder neck stenosis was 3 (1-16). The median operative time was 123 (110-159) minutes. No intraoperative complications were reported. Three patients suffered a grade 2 complication. After a median follow-up of 27 (4-74) months, the recurrence-free rate was 100% with no evidence of de-novo incontinence or erectile dysfunction.
In our series, robot-assisted T-plasty suggests positive and safe outcomes in treating recalcitrant bladder neck stenosis with a good patency rate and low incontinence rate. Additionally, cystoscopy is reliable in the diagnosis of patients with inconclusive urethrography results.
本研究旨在描述机器人辅助T形整形术治疗顽固性膀胱颈狭窄的技术及初步治疗效果。
纳入在单一中心接受机器人辅助T形整形术治疗顽固性膀胱颈狭窄的患者。术前通过逆行尿道造影与排尿期膀胱尿道造影及软性尿道镜检查相结合来确诊膀胱颈狭窄。随访时进行病史采集、尿流率测定及超声残余尿量测量。并发症根据Clavien-Dindo分类法分级。无尿路症状且最大尿流率不少于15mL/s的患者视为治疗成功。否则,将进行膀胱镜检查,复发定义为无法通过14F膀胱镜经膀胱颈。
自2018年以来,共治疗7例患者。病因分别为经尿道前列腺切除术6例和单纯前列腺切除术1例。膀胱镜检查在所有病例中均能诊断膀胱颈狭窄,而尿道造影在7例中有3例结果不明确。手术时的中位(范围)年龄为60(54 - 75)岁,既往膀胱颈狭窄内镜治疗的中位次数为3(1 - 16)次。中位手术时间为123(110 - 159)分钟。未报告术中并发症。3例患者出现2级并发症。中位随访27(4 - 74)个月后,无复发率为100%,无新发尿失禁或勃起功能障碍的证据。
在我们的系列研究中,机器人辅助T形整形术治疗顽固性膀胱颈狭窄显示出积极且安全的效果,通畅率良好且尿失禁率低。此外,膀胱镜检查在尿道造影结果不明确的患者诊断中可靠。