• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[跨学科多模式疼痛治疗:剂量有影响吗?:来自常规临床护理的比较]

[Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: does the dose make a difference? : A comparison from routine clinical care].

作者信息

Baumbach Philipp, Storch Peter, Weiss Thomas, Meissner Winfried, Rottstädt Fabian

机构信息

Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.

Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Neurologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00838-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00482-024-00838-6
PMID:39382691
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is an established treatment for patients with severe chronic pain. Little evidence is available on the role of treatment dosage and, in particular, on the association between the duration of IMPT and treatment outcome.

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the medium-term treatment success of a short inpatient (SIT, 1 week) and a long outpatient (LOT, 4 weeks) IMPT with a comparable treatment concept and comparable therapy intensity (20 h/week) in patients with severe chronic pain.

METHODS

Patients in both groups completed the German Pain Questionnaire at the beginning and end of IMPT as well as after 3 months. Primary outcome measures included pain-related impairment and average pain intensity at follow-up in patients of comparable sex, age as well as pain intensity and impairment at the beginning of the therapy.

RESULTS

While both groups initially showed significant treatment effects in pain-related impairment and average pain intensity, LOT patients (n = 32) reported significantly better values in both variables at 3‑month follow-up compared with SIT patients (n = 32). This was due to sustained positive effects in LOT patients and worsening in the SIT group.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that initial treatment effects can be observed in both treatment settings, but a longer duration of therapy seems to favour the long-term stability of treatment effects.

摘要

背景

跨学科多模式疼痛治疗(IMPT)是一种针对重度慢性疼痛患者的既定治疗方法。关于治疗剂量的作用,尤其是关于IMPT持续时间与治疗效果之间的关联,目前证据较少。

目的

这项回顾性研究的目的是比较短期住院(SIT,1周)和长期门诊(LOT,4周)IMPT在重度慢性疼痛患者中的中期治疗成功率,这两种治疗具有可比的治疗理念和可比的治疗强度(每周20小时)。

方法

两组患者在IMPT开始和结束时以及3个月后均完成了德国疼痛问卷。主要结局指标包括在随访时,具有可比性的性别、年龄、治疗开始时的疼痛强度和损伤程度的患者的疼痛相关损伤和平均疼痛强度。

结果

虽然两组在疼痛相关损伤和平均疼痛强度方面最初均显示出显著的治疗效果,但与短期住院患者(n = 32)相比,长期门诊患者(n = 32)在3个月随访时在这两个变量上的报告值均显著更好。这是由于长期门诊患者的积极效果持续存在,而短期住院组的情况恶化。

结论

结果表明,在两种治疗环境中均可观察到初始治疗效果,但较长的治疗持续时间似乎有利于治疗效果的长期稳定性。

相似文献

1
[Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: does the dose make a difference? : A comparison from routine clinical care].[跨学科多模式疼痛治疗:剂量有影响吗?:来自常规临床护理的比较]
Schmerz. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00838-6.
2
PAIN2.0: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy to manage recurrent pain for patients with risk factors of developing chronic pain in Germany.PAIN2.0:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估 10 周门诊综合多模式疼痛治疗对德国有发展为慢性疼痛风险因素的复发性疼痛患者的疗效。
Trials. 2024 Feb 23;25(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07975-4.
3
[Effectiveness of inpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) : A retrospective study].住院患者多学科综合疼痛治疗(IMPT)对复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Schmerz. 2022 Apr;36(2):81-88. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00563-4. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
5
[Cross-sectoral interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy : Recommendations on structural and process parameters of the ad hoc commission "Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy" of the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.  V.)].[跨部门跨学科多模式疼痛治疗:德国疼痛协会(Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V.)“跨学科多模式疼痛治疗”特别委员会的结构和流程参数建议]
Schmerz. 2019 Jun;33(3):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s00482-019-0374-2.
6
Setting the stage for pain relief: how treatment setting impacts interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment for patients with chronic back pain.为疼痛缓解奠定基础:治疗环境如何影响慢性背痛患者的多学科多模式疼痛治疗
Pain. 2024 Dec 1;165(12):2909-2919. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003318. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
[Results of a pilot study on the role of therapy expectation in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy for chronic back pain].[关于治疗期望在慢性背痛跨学科多模式疼痛治疗中作用的初步研究结果]
Schmerz. 2022 Jun;36(3):172-181. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00590-1. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
[Pediatric inpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment in Germany].[德国儿科住院患者的跨学科多模式疼痛治疗]
Schmerz. 2024 Apr;38(2):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00744-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的跨学科多模式疼痛治疗方案的纵向结局评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-335. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1875. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
10
Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study.跨学科多模式疼痛治疗中额外的疼痛神经科学教育对当前疼痛的影响。一项非随机对照干预研究。
J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 16;13:2947-2957. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S272943. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary-based Rehabilitation (MBR) Compared With Active Physical Interventions for Pain and Disability in Adults With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.多学科康复(MBR)与主动身体干预治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛和残疾:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Nov;36(11):874-886. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000871.
2
Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).慢性疼痛:作为一种症状或疾病——国际疼痛学会(IASP)对《国际疾病分类》第 11 版(ICD-11)中慢性疼痛的分类。
Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
3
Multimodal pain therapy in chronic noncancer pain-gold standard or need for further clarification?
慢性非癌性疼痛的多模式疼痛治疗——金标准还是需要进一步明确?
Pain. 2017 Oct;158(10):1853-1859. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000902.
4
The epidemiology of chronic pain.慢性疼痛的流行病学。
Pain. 2016 Oct;157(10):2158-2159. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000676.
5
[Depression, anxiety and stress scales: DASS--A screening procedure not only for pain patients].[抑郁、焦虑和压力量表:抑郁焦虑压力量表——一种不仅适用于疼痛患者的筛查程序]
Schmerz. 2015 Dec;29(6):649-57. doi: 10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z.
6
[Multimodal pain therapy for treatment of chronic pain syndrome. Consensus paper of the ad hoc commission on multimodal interdisciplinary pain management of the German Pain Society on treatment contents].[多模式疼痛疗法治疗慢性疼痛综合征。德国疼痛学会多模式跨学科疼痛管理特设委员会关于治疗内容的共识文件]
Schmerz. 2014 Oct;28(5):459-72. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1471-x.
7
Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.剂量还是内容?慢性下腰痛患者疼痛康复计划的有效性:一项系统评价。
Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
8
Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.效应量估计:当前使用、计算和解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18. doi: 10.1037/a0024338. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
9
Normative values for the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in the general German population.一般德国人群中医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)的常模值。
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Aug;71(2):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
10
[Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy at the University Pain Centre Dresden].[德累斯顿大学疼痛中心多模式疼痛治疗的评估]
Schmerz. 2009 Dec;23(6):609-17. doi: 10.1007/s00482-009-0827-0.