Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.

School of Medicine, The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Keele University, Dudley, UK.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 9;18(1):364. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02048-9.

Abstract

The aim of this study is To compare robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on both short- and long-term outcomes A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. The studies included were randomised controlled trials directly comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA. The outcomes were pooled as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval. RevMan software version 5.4 was used for performing the statistical analysis. Nine studies deemed eligible for inclusion. The data showed a significant favouring of robotic-assisted than the conventional TKA in mechanical alignment, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and femoral coronal plane outliers (MD =  - 1.10, 95% CI [- 1.51, - 0.69], p < 0.00001), (MD =  - 1.19, 95% CI [- 2.35, - 0.03], p = 0.04), and (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.30, 0.80], p = 0.004), respectively. On the other hand, conventional TKA was better in range of motion-flexion (long-term) than the robotic-assisted one (MD =  - 3.02, 95% CI [- 3.68, - 2.37], p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between them in knee society score-knee score, knee society score-function score, change in hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee rating scale, and change in range of motion-extension (MD =  - 0.36, 95% CI [- 2.43, 1.70], p = 0.73), (MD =  - 0.34, 95% CI [- 2.36, 1.68], p = 0.74), (MD = 0.78, 95% CI [- 0.84, 2.40], p = 0.34), and (MD = 0.16, 95% [- 1.32, 1.64], p = 0.83), respectively. Robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated better outcomes than conventional TKA in terms of mechanical alignment and WOMAC scores. However, the conventional TKA showed a better range of motion-flexion in the long term. More data are needed to assess long-term outcomes comprehensively.

摘要

本研究旨在比较机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术(TKA)在短期和长期结果方面的差异。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价。检索 PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库以获取相关研究。纳入的研究为直接比较机器人辅助与传统 TKA 的随机对照试验。将结局指标合并为均数差(MD)或风险比(RR),并给出 95%置信区间。使用 RevMan 软件版本 5.4 进行统计分析。符合纳入标准的 9 项研究。数据显示,在机械对线、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及股骨冠状面外偏(MD=-1.10,95%CI[-1.51,-0.69],p<0.00001)、(MD=-1.19,95%CI[-2.35,-0.03],p=0.04)和(RR=0.49,95%CI[0.30,0.80],p=0.004)方面,机器人辅助 TKA 优于传统 TKA。另一方面,传统 TKA 在膝关节活动度-屈曲(长期)方面优于机器人辅助 TKA(MD=-3.02,95%CI[-3.68,-2.37],p<0.00001)。在膝关节学会评分-膝关节评分、膝关节学会评分-功能评分、改良的美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)变化以及膝关节活动度-伸展变化方面,两者之间没有显著差异(MD=-0.36,95%CI[-2.43,1.70],p=0.73)、(MD=-0.34,95%CI[-2.36,1.68],p=0.74)、(MD=0.78,95%CI[-0.84,2.40],p=0.34)和(MD=0.16,95%[-1.32,1.64],p=0.83)。机器人辅助 TKA 在机械对线和 WOMAC 评分方面优于传统 TKA,但在长期方面,传统 TKA 显示出更好的膝关节活动度-屈曲。需要更多数据来全面评估长期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验