Suppr超能文献

有多个时钟记录着我们的时间:14种年龄和衰老替代指标之间的横断面和纵向关联。

There Are Multiple Clocks That Time Us: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations Among 14 Alternative Indicators of Age and Aging.

作者信息

Drewelies Johanna, Homann Jan, Vetter Valentin Max, Düzel Sandra, Kühn Simone, Deecke Laura, Steinhagen-Thiessen Elisabeth, Jawinski Philippe, Markett Sebastian, Lindenberger Ulman, Lill Christina M, Bertram Lars, Demuth Ilja, Gerstorf Denis

机构信息

Center for Environmental Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 May 5;80(6). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae244.

Abstract

Aging is a complex process influenced by mechanisms operating at numerous levels of functioning. Multiple biomarkers of age have been identified, yet we know little about how the different alternative age indicators are intertwined. In the Berlin Aging Study II (nmin = 328; nmax = 1 517, women = 51%; 14.27 years of education), we examined how levels and 7-year changes in indicators derived from blood assays, magnetic resonance imaging brain scans, other-ratings, and self-reports converge among older adults. We included 8 epigenetic biomarkers (incl. 5 epigenetic "clocks"), a BioAge composite from clinical laboratory parameters, brain age, skin age, subjective age, subjective life expectancy, and subjective health horizon. We found moderate associations within aging domains, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally over 7 years. However, associations across different domains were infrequent and modest. Notably, participants with older BioAge had correspondingly older epigenetic ages. Our results suggest that different aging clocks are only loosely interconnected and that more specific measures are needed to differentiate healthy from unhealthy aging.

摘要

衰老是一个复杂的过程,受到多个功能层面运行机制的影响。多种衰老生物标志物已被确定,但我们对不同的替代年龄指标如何相互交织却知之甚少。在柏林衰老研究II(最小样本量=328;最大样本量=1517,女性占51%;受教育年限14.27年)中,我们研究了血液检测、磁共振成像脑部扫描、他人评分和自我报告得出的指标水平及7年变化在老年人中是如何趋同的。我们纳入了8种表观遗传生物标志物(包括5种表观遗传“时钟”)、一个来自临床实验室参数的生物年龄综合指标、脑年龄、皮肤年龄、主观年龄、主观预期寿命和主观健康预期。我们发现,在衰老领域内,无论是横断面研究还是7年的纵向研究,都存在中等程度的关联。然而,不同领域之间的关联很少且程度适中。值得注意的是,生物年龄较大的参与者其表观遗传年龄也相应较大。我们的结果表明,不同的衰老时钟之间只是松散地相互关联,需要更具体的指标来区分健康衰老和不健康衰老。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验