Bramanti Stefania, Mannina Daniele, Chiappella Annalisa, Casadei Beatrice, De Philippis Chiara, Giordano Laura, Navarria Pierina, Mancosu Pietro, Taurino Daniela, Scorsetti Marta, Carlo-Stella Carmelo, Zinzani Pierluigi, Santoro Armando, Corradini Paolo
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas, Cancer Center, Milano, Rozzano Milano, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Jan;60(1):32-38. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.8% of RT-group, 89.2% of CT-group and 78.8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0.079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0.05). The one-year PFS was 51.2% in the RT-group, 28.2% in the CT-group, and 47.6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86.7% in the RT-group, 52.7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging). We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20.0% CT-group, 3.3% RT-group, 7.7% no-bridge group; p = 0.05). In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.
在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中,嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞治疗前桥接方案的优化可能会影响CAR-T细胞的疗效和治疗结果。这项回顾性研究评估了放疗(RT)桥接和其他桥接策略后的CAR-T细胞治疗结果。在148例接受白细胞分离术以制备CAR-T细胞的复发/难治性DLBCL患者中,31例接受了RT桥接,84例接受了化疗(CT),33例未进行桥接或仅使用类固醇。RT组96.8%的患者、CT组89.2%的患者和无桥接组78.8%的患者输注了CAR-T细胞(p = 0.079)。桥接治疗的反应总体较差,但接受RT治疗的患者在桥接前后LDH水平显著降低(p = 0.05)。RT组的1年无进展生存期(PFS)为51.2%,CT组为28.2%,无桥接组为47.6%(p = 0.044,CT桥接与RT桥接相比);RT组的1年总生存期(OS)为86.7%,CT组为52.7%,无桥接组为69%(p = 0.025,CT桥接与RT桥接相比)。我们观察到接受CT治疗的患者中免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的发生率高于其他患者(CT组20.0%,RT组3.3%,无桥接组7.7%;p = 0.05)。总之,RT桥接与较低的退出率和CAR-T细胞毒性相关,对于局限性疾病患者或有一个主要症状部位的患者,它可能比其他桥接策略更可取。