Leite Beatriz Nogueira, Rubez João Vitor Nogueira, Soufen Carlos Alberto Arruda, Pereira Bruna Zanetti, Santana Marcos Vinicius Felix, Dobashi Eiffel Tsuyoshi
Hospital IFOR - Rede D'or, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil.
Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Oct 7;32(4):e278912. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243204e278912. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the intra and inter observer agreement of the Sauvegrain, Greulich and Pyle methods.
This is an observational, retrospective and cross-sectional study ethically approved by opinion 6,192,391. 100 radiographic images of the elbow and 100 of the left wrist and hand were collected from children whose images were selected by a researcher who did not carry out the evaluations. The Sauvegrain, Greulich and Pyle methods were used to determine bone age. We provided a detailed explanation of each method and the evaluators received a file with the study images. After three weeks, the exams were randomized and the radiograms were reevaluated. Of the 100 patients in group A, 61 (61%) were boys and 39 (39%) were girls. In group B, 67 (67%) were boys and 33 (33%) were girls.
correlation; intraclass correlation; analysis using the Bland-Altman graph; differences between groups.
Intra and interobserver agreement between groups was considered excellent.
Despite the excellent agreement, group A presented a significantly better value than B. Biological ages show a greater difference compared to chronological ages in group A. In group B, skeletal and chronological ages do not show statistical difference according to the accuracy test.
评估索维格兰、格吕利希和派尔方法在观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
这是一项经伦理批准(意见编号6,192,391)的观察性、回顾性和横断面研究。从儿童中收集了100张肘部X线影像以及100张左手腕和手部的X线影像,这些影像由一名不参与评估的研究人员挑选。采用索维格兰、格吕利希和派尔方法确定骨龄。我们对每种方法进行了详细解释,评估人员收到了包含研究影像的文件。三周后,对检查进行随机分组,对X线片重新评估。A组的100名患者中,61名(61%)为男孩,39名(39%)为女孩。B组中,67名(67%)为男孩,33名(33%)为女孩。
相关性分析;组内相关分析;使用布兰德 - 奥特曼图进行分析;组间差异分析。
组间观察者内和观察者间的一致性被认为是极佳的。
尽管一致性极佳,但A组的值明显优于B组。A组的生物年龄与实际年龄相比差异更大。在B组中,根据准确性测试,骨骼年龄和实际年龄没有统计学差异。