Suppr超能文献

索维格兰法与格-派法之间骨龄一致性的评估

ASSESSEMENT OF BONE AGE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAUVEGRAIN AND GREULICH AND PYLE METHODS.

作者信息

Leite Beatriz Nogueira, Rubez João Vitor Nogueira, Soufen Carlos Alberto Arruda, Pereira Bruna Zanetti, Santana Marcos Vinicius Felix, Dobashi Eiffel Tsuyoshi

机构信息

Hospital IFOR - Rede D'or, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil.

Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Oct 7;32(4):e278912. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243204e278912. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the intra and inter observer agreement of the Sauvegrain, Greulich and Pyle methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective and cross-sectional study ethically approved by opinion 6,192,391. 100 radiographic images of the elbow and 100 of the left wrist and hand were collected from children whose images were selected by a researcher who did not carry out the evaluations. The Sauvegrain, Greulich and Pyle methods were used to determine bone age. We provided a detailed explanation of each method and the evaluators received a file with the study images. After three weeks, the exams were randomized and the radiograms were reevaluated. Of the 100 patients in group A, 61 (61%) were boys and 39 (39%) were girls. In group B, 67 (67%) were boys and 33 (33%) were girls.

FOUR STATISTICAL ANALYZES WERE USED

correlation; intraclass correlation; analysis using the Bland-Altman graph; differences between groups.

RESULTS

Intra and interobserver agreement between groups was considered excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the excellent agreement, group A presented a significantly better value than B. Biological ages show a greater difference compared to chronological ages in group A. In group B, skeletal and chronological ages do not show statistical difference according to the accuracy test.

摘要

目的

评估索维格兰、格吕利希和派尔方法在观察者内和观察者间的一致性。

材料与方法

这是一项经伦理批准(意见编号6,192,391)的观察性、回顾性和横断面研究。从儿童中收集了100张肘部X线影像以及100张左手腕和手部的X线影像,这些影像由一名不参与评估的研究人员挑选。采用索维格兰、格吕利希和派尔方法确定骨龄。我们对每种方法进行了详细解释,评估人员收到了包含研究影像的文件。三周后,对检查进行随机分组,对X线片重新评估。A组的100名患者中,61名(61%)为男孩,39名(39%)为女孩。B组中,67名(67%)为男孩,33名(33%)为女孩。

使用了四种统计分析方法

相关性分析;组内相关分析;使用布兰德 - 奥特曼图进行分析;组间差异分析。

结果

组间观察者内和观察者间的一致性被认为是极佳的。

结论

尽管一致性极佳,但A组的值明显优于B组。A组的生物年龄与实际年龄相比差异更大。在B组中,根据准确性测试,骨骼年龄和实际年龄没有统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a885/11460657/5851327c1230/1809-4406-aob-32-04-e278912-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验