Stamatis Pavlos, Turesson Carl, Mohammad Aladdin J
Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Rheumatology, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 25;11:1453462. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1453462. eCollection 2024.
Although its role has been debated, temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of cranial giant cell arteritis (GCA). The specificity of TAB is excellent and the sensitivity, albeit lower, is comparable with other diagnostic modalities used for the diagnosis of GCA. This outpatient procedure has a low rate of complications and is well integrated in the majority of healthcare systems. The length of the specimen, the number of the examined sections and the prolonged use of glucocorticoids before the biopsy may affect the outcome of the TAB as diagnostic tool. The typical histological findings in GCA are often characterized by granulomatous inflammation with infiltration of mononuclear cells with or without the presence of giant cell, varying degrees of external and internal elastic lamina damage and intimal thickening. Overlooking signs of inflammation in the adventitia and in connective tissue surrounding the temporal artery may lead to false negative results. The distinction between healed arteritis and age-related atherosclerosis may be challenging.
尽管颞动脉活检(TAB)的作用一直存在争议,但它仍然是诊断颅巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的金标准。TAB的特异性极佳,其敏感性虽较低,但与用于诊断GCA的其他诊断方法相当。这种门诊手术并发症发生率低,并且在大多数医疗保健系统中都能很好地开展。活检前标本的长度、检查切片的数量以及糖皮质激素的长期使用可能会影响TAB作为诊断工具的结果。GCA典型的组织学表现通常以肉芽肿性炎症为特征,伴有或不伴有巨细胞的单核细胞浸润、不同程度的内弹力膜和外弹力膜损伤以及内膜增厚。忽略颞动脉外膜和周围结缔组织中的炎症迹象可能会导致假阴性结果。区分愈合的动脉炎和与年龄相关的动脉粥样硬化可能具有挑战性。