The move to 24/7 mechanical thrombectomy provision for ischaemic stroke: an observational study of the impact on referrals, activity, procedural efficacy, and safety at a supra-regional centre.

BACKGROUND

Health systems are striving to improve delivery of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for ischaemic stroke. With the move to 24/7 provision, we aimed to assess (1) the change in referral and procedural frequency and timing, (2) reasons referrals did not proceed to MT, and (3) nocturnal procedural efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This was an observational study comparing 12-month data for an extended daytime service (2021/2022, hours, 0800-2000) to that for a 12-month period delivering 24/7 cover (2023-2024). Nocturnal and daytime outcomes (rate of recanalisation using modified TICI scoring), extent of postprocedural infarction (using ASPECTS grading), rate of early neurological improvement (using 24-h NIHSS change), 90-day mortality, and complicating symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) in the latter period were compared.

RESULTS

Both referrals (432 to 851) and procedural caseload (191 to 403) approximately doubled with the move to 24/7 cover; 36% of procedures occurred overnight (n = 145). The dominant reasons for referrals not proceeding to MT were a large core infarct (n = 144) or absence of a large vessel occlusion on baseline imaging (n = 140). There were no significant differences in successful recanalisation (TICI 2B/3: 85.5% vs 87.1%, P = .233), rates of postprocedural ASPECTS≥7 (74.9% vs 75.8%, P = .987), early neurological improvement (NIHSS reduction ≥30%: 43.4% vs 42.4%, P = .917), 90-day mortality (19.6% vs 18.6%, P = .896), or SICH (1.9% vs 4.1%, P = .214) obtained for daytime vs nighttime hours.

CONCLUSION

24/7 MT provision has resulted in a rapid rise in the number of patients who may benefit from MT. This service can be provided with an acceptable safety profile during nighttime hours in a high-volume comprehensive UK centre.