Rivas Dominic J L, Weinstein Stuart, Tatum Marcus, Aitken Holly D, Ford Alison, Dempewolf Spencer, Willey Michael C, Goetz Jessica E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):343-358. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003268. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
The severity of hip dysplasia is characterized by radiographic measurements that require user definition of the acetabular sourcil edge, a bony landmark for which the corresponding three-dimensional (3D) anatomy is not well defined in any imaging plane.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To use digitally reconstructed radiographs to determine: (1) What 3D anatomy is contributing to the "acetabular sourcil" location used to make lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) measurements in standing AP and false-profile radiographic views, respectively? (2) How do intraobserver and interobserver agreement in LCEA and ACEA translate into agreement of the 3D anatomy being evaluated? (3) How distinct are regions around the acetabular rim circumference that are evaluated by LCEA and ACEA measurements on radiographs?
Between January 2018 and May 2019, 72 patients were indicated for periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia or acetabular retroversion at our institution. From these patients, a series of 10 patients were identified of the first 12 patients in 2018 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy, excluding two with missing or low-quality clinical imaging. A second series of 10 patients was identified of the first 11 patients in 2019 who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy and concurrent hip arthroscopy, excluding one who was missing clinical imaging. Pelvis and femoral bone surface models were generated from CT scans of these two series of 10 patients. There were 15 female and five male patients, with a median patient age of 18 years (IQR 17 to 23 years), a preoperative LCEA of 22° (IQR 18° to 24°), and a preoperative ACEA of 23° (IQR 18° to 27°). Exclusion criteria included missing preoperative CT or standard clinical radiographic imaging or severe joint incongruity. To address our first study question, digitally reconstructed radiographs matching each patient's standing AP and false-profile clinical radiographs were created from the segmented CT volumes. A board-certified orthopaedic surgeon and three trained researchers measured LCEA and ACEA on the digitally reconstructed radiographs, and the selected sourcil points were projected back into coordinates in the 3D anatomic space. To address our second study question, intraobserver and interobserver agreement in radiographic coverage angles were related to variations in 3D coordinates of the selected bony anatomy. Lastly, to address our third study question, 3D locations around the acetabular rim identified as contributing to the lateral and anterior sourcil points were summarized across patients in a clockface coordinate system, and statistical analysis of the "time" separating the 3D acetabular contributions of the sourcil edges was performed.
The 3D anatomy contributing to the lateral sourcil was a variable length (27 mm [IQR 15 to 34 mm]) span of the laterosuperior acetabular edges, with contributions by the anterior inferior iliac spine in 35% (7 of 20) of hips. The anterior sourcil reflected a 28-mm (IQR 25 to 31 mm) span of bone from the medial ilium (posterior-medial to the anterior-inferior iliac spine and anterior-lateral to the arcuate line) to the anterior and lateral edges of the acetabulum. Interobserver variability was good for LCEA (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.82 to 0.83) and moderate to good for ACEA (ICC 0.73 to 0.79), whereas the agreement in identified 3D sourcil locations varied widely (ICC 0.32 to 0.95). The acetabular edge of the 3D anatomy contributing to the anterior sourcil overlapped the circumferential range of the acetabular rim contributing to the lateral sourcil.
Projection of two-dimensional radiographic landmarks contributing to the diagnosis of structural hip deformity into 3D allowed for the identification of the overlapping bony anatomy contributing to radiographically visible anterior and lateral sourcil edges.
This work leveraging digitally reconstructed radiographs and 3D pelvis anatomy has found that bone outside the joint contributes to the radiographic appearance of the sourcil and may variably confound estimates of joint coverage. Furthermore, the substantial overlap between the acetabular bone contributing to measurement of the LCEA and ACEA would indicate that these angles measure similar acetabular deformity, and that additional measures are needed to assess anterior coverage independent of lateral coverage.
髋关节发育不良的严重程度通过影像学测量来表征,而这些测量需要使用者定义髋臼眉弓边缘,这是一个在任何成像平面中其相应三维(3D)解剖结构都未明确界定的骨性标志。
问题/目的:使用数字重建X线片来确定:(1)在站立前后位(AP)和假斜位X线片视图中,分别用于测量外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)和前侧中心边缘角(ACEA)的“髋臼眉弓”位置是由哪些3D解剖结构构成的?(2)LCEA和ACEA的观察者内和观察者间一致性如何转化为所评估的3D解剖结构的一致性?(3)通过X线片上LCEA和ACEA测量所评估的髋臼边缘周围区域有多明显不同?
2018年1月至2019年5月期间,在我们机构有72例患者因髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良或髋臼后倾而被收治。从这些患者中,确定了2018年接受髋臼周围截骨术的前12例患者中的10例,排除2例临床影像缺失或质量差的患者。在2019年接受髋臼周围截骨术并同期进行髋关节镜检查的前11例患者中确定了另一组10例患者,排除1例临床影像缺失的患者。通过这两组各10例患者的CT扫描生成骨盆和股骨骨表面模型。有15例女性和5例男性患者,患者年龄中位数为18岁(四分位间距17至23岁),术前LCEA为22°(四分位间距18°至24°),术前ACEA为23°(四分位间距18°至27°)。排除标准包括术前CT或标准临床X线影像缺失或严重关节不匹配。为解决我们的第一个研究问题,从分割后的CT容积中创建与每位患者的站立AP和假斜位临床X线片相匹配的数字重建X线片。一名获得骨科专科医师资格认证的外科医生和三名经过培训的研究人员在数字重建X线片上测量LCEA和ACEA,并将选定的眉弓点投影回3D解剖空间中的坐标。为解决我们的第二个研究问题,将X线影像覆盖角度的观察者内和观察者间一致性与选定骨性解剖结构的3D坐标变化相关联。最后,为解决我们的第三个研究问题,在一个钟面坐标系中总结了髋臼边缘周围被确定为对外侧和前侧眉弓点有贡献的3D位置,并对眉弓边缘的3D髋臼贡献之间的“时间”间隔进行了统计分析。
对外侧眉弓有贡献的3D解剖结构是髋臼上外侧边缘的可变长度(27mm[四分位间距15至34mm])跨度,35%(20个髋关节中的7个)的髋关节有髂前下棘的贡献。前侧眉弓反映了从髂骨内侧(髂前下棘后内侧至弓状线前外侧)到髋臼前侧和外侧边缘的28mm(四分位间距25至31mm)跨度的骨。观察者间变异性对于LCEA良好(组内相关系数[ICC]0.82至0.83),对于ACEA为中等至良好(ICC 0.73至0.79),而在确定的3D眉弓位置的一致性差异很大(ICC 0.32至0.95)。对前侧眉弓有贡献的3D解剖结构的髋臼边缘与对外侧眉弓有贡献的髋臼边缘的圆周范围重叠。
将有助于诊断髋关节结构畸形的二维X线标志投影到3D中,可以识别出对X线可见的前侧和外侧眉弓边缘有贡献的重叠骨性解剖结构。
这项利用数字重建X线片和3D骨盆解剖结构的研究发现,关节外的骨对眉弓的X线表现有贡献,并且可能不同程度地混淆关节覆盖的评估。此外,对LCEA和ACEA测量有贡献的髋臼骨之间存在大量重叠,这表明这些角度测量的是相似的髋臼畸形,并且需要额外的测量来独立于外侧覆盖评估前侧覆盖情况。