• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑电微状态转换代价与任务需求相关。

EEG microstate transition cost correlates with task demands.

机构信息

Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Povo, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Oct 10;20(10):e1012521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012521. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012521
PMID:39388512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495555/
Abstract

The ability to solve complex tasks relies on the adaptive changes occurring in the spatio-temporal organization of brain activity under different conditions. Altered flexibility in these dynamics can lead to impaired cognitive performance, manifesting for instance as difficulties in attention regulation, distraction inhibition, and behavioral adaptation. Such impairments result in decreased efficiency and increased effort in accomplishing goal-directed tasks. Therefore, developing quantitative measures that can directly assess the effort involved in these transitions using neural data is of paramount importance. In this study, we propose a framework to associate cognitive effort during the performance of tasks with electroencephalography (EEG) activation patterns. The methodology relies on the identification of discrete dynamical states (EEG microstates) and optimal transport theory. To validate the effectiveness of this framework, we apply it to a dataset collected during a spatial version of the Stroop task, a cognitive test in which participants respond to one aspect of a stimulus while ignoring another, often conflicting, aspect. The Stroop task is a cognitive test where participants must respond to one aspect of a stimulus while ignoring another, often conflicting, aspect. Our findings reveal an increased cost linked to cognitive effort, thus confirming the framework's effectiveness in capturing and quantifying cognitive transitions. By utilizing a fully data-driven method, this research opens up fresh perspectives for physiologically describing cognitive effort within the brain.

摘要

解决复杂任务的能力依赖于大脑活动在不同条件下的时空组织的适应性变化。这些动态的灵活性改变可能导致认知表现受损,例如在注意力调节、分心抑制和行为适应方面出现困难。这些损伤导致在完成目标导向任务时效率降低,努力增加。因此,开发使用神经数据直接评估这些转变所涉及的认知努力的定量测量方法至关重要。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个将任务执行过程中的认知努力与脑电图(EEG)激活模式相关联的框架。该方法依赖于离散动力学状态(EEG 微状态)的识别和最优传输理论。为了验证该框架的有效性,我们将其应用于在空间版 Stroop 任务中收集的数据集,这是一种认知测试,参与者需要对刺激的一个方面做出反应,同时忽略另一个经常与之冲突的方面。Stroop 任务是一种认知测试,参与者必须对刺激的一个方面做出反应,同时忽略另一个经常与之冲突的方面。我们的研究结果揭示了与认知努力相关的成本增加,从而证实了该框架在捕捉和量化认知转变方面的有效性。通过利用完全数据驱动的方法,这项研究为在大脑中生理描述认知努力开辟了新的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/b2d3856ef260/pcbi.1012521.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/f813f94d451a/pcbi.1012521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/944aae5c11f8/pcbi.1012521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/2f79da8b1319/pcbi.1012521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/b2d3856ef260/pcbi.1012521.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/f813f94d451a/pcbi.1012521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/944aae5c11f8/pcbi.1012521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/2f79da8b1319/pcbi.1012521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a177/11495555/b2d3856ef260/pcbi.1012521.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
EEG microstate transition cost correlates with task demands.脑电微状态转换代价与任务需求相关。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Oct 10;20(10):e1012521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012521. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Cognitive manipulation of brain electric microstates.大脑电微状态的认知操控。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
EEG signals respond differently to idea generation, idea evolution and evaluation in a loosely controlled creativity experiment.脑电图信号在一个松散控制的创造力实验中对创意生成、创意演变和评估的反应不同。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81655-0.
4
Cognitive load during driving: EEG microstate metrics are sensitive to task difficulty and predict safety outcomes.驾驶时的认知负荷:EEG 微观状态指标对任务难度敏感,并可预测安全结果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Nov;207:107769. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107769. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Capturing the Forest but Missing the Trees: Microstates Inadequate for Characterizing Shorter-Scale EEG Dynamics.只见森林不见树木:微状态不足以表征较短尺度的脑电图动态。
Neural Comput. 2019 Nov;31(11):2177-2211. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01229. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Pre-stimulus alpha and post-stimulus N2 foreshadow imminent errors in a single task.刺激前的阿尔法波和刺激后的N2波预示着单一任务中即将出现的错误。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct;77:346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
7
Microstate functional connectivity in EEG cognitive tasks revealed by a multivariate Gaussian hidden Markov model with phase locking value.基于相位锁定值的多元高斯隐马尔可夫模型揭示 EEG 认知任务中的微状态功能连接。
J Neural Eng. 2019 Apr;16(2):026033. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0169. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
8
Evidence for modulation of EEG microstates by mental workload levels and task types.证据表明,脑电微状态可被心理工作量水平和任务类型调节。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26552. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26552. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
EEG microstates distinguish between cognitive components of fluid reasoning.脑电图微观状态可区分流畅推理的认知成分。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:560-573. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.067. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
"Can waiting awaken the resting brain?" A comparison of waiting- and cognitive task-induced attenuation of very low frequency neural oscillations.“等待能否唤醒休眠的大脑?”等待与认知任务诱导的极低频神经振荡衰减的比较。
Brain Res. 2013 Aug 2;1524:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.043. Epub 2013 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Hidden time-patterns in cyclic human movements: a matter of temporal Fibonacci sequence generation and harmonization.周期性人体运动中的隐藏时间模式:时间斐波那契数列生成与协调问题。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Apr 8;19:1525403. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1525403. eCollection 2025.
2
Changes in EEG Microstate Dynamics and Cognition Post-Chemotherapy in People With Breast Cancer.乳腺癌患者化疗后脑电图微状态动力学及认知的变化
Brain Behav. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70335. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70335.
3
A retrospective, observational study of real-world clinical data from the Cognitive Function Development Therapy program.

本文引用的文献

1
Tango of control: The interplay between proactive and reactive control.主动与被动控制的博弈:控制间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jun;153(6):1644-1670. doi: 10.1037/xge0001585. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
2
Propofol Reversibly Attenuates Short-Range Microstate Ordering and 20 Hz Microstate Oscillations.丙泊酚可逆转削弱短程微状态有序性和 20Hz 微状态振荡。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Mar;37(2):329-342. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-01023-1. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
On the relationship between emotions and cognitive control: Evidence from an observational study on emotional priming Stroop task.
一项对认知功能发展治疗项目真实世界临床数据的回顾性观察研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 18;18:1508815. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1508815. eCollection 2024.
情绪与认知控制的关系:来自情绪启动斯特鲁普任务的观察研究证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294957. eCollection 2023.
4
Prenatal experience with language shapes the brain.产前语言体验塑造大脑。
Sci Adv. 2023 Nov 24;9(47):eadj3524. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj3524. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
The Stroop legacy: A cautionary tale on methodological issues and a proposed spatial solution.斯特鲁普效应的遗留问题:一个关于方法学问题的警示故事及一个建议的空间解决方案。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4758-4785. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02215-0. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
EEG Microstates as a Signature of Hemispheric Lateralization in Stroke.脑电图微观状态作为中风半球侧化的特征。
Brain Topogr. 2024 May;37(3):475-478. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00967-8. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review.静息态 EEG 微状态的功能方面:系统评价。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Mar;37(2):181-217. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00958-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
8
Electrocorticographic Activation Patterns of Electroencephalographic Microstates.脑电微状态的脑电皮质电图激活模式。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Mar;37(2):287-295. doi: 10.1007/s10548-023-00952-1. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
A comparison between different variants of the spatial Stroop task: The influence of analytic flexibility on Stroop effect estimates and reliability.不同空间 Stroop 任务变体的比较:分析灵活性对 Stroop 效应估计和可靠性的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):934-951. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02091-8. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Optimal Control Costs of Brain State Transitions in Linear Stochastic Systems.线性随机系统中脑状态转变的最优控制代价。
J Neurosci. 2023 Jan 11;43(2):270-281. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1053-22.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 16.