Suppr超能文献

在加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州,机器人的可用性而非付款方身份决定了是否能够获得机器人紧急普通外科疝修补术。

Robotic availability, not payor status, determines access to robotic emergency general surgery hernia repair in California and Florida.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6923-6929. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11283-y. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that access to robotic surgery is influenced by socioeconomic factors, including insurance status. The 2010 Affordable Care Act established an avenue for states to expand Medicaid coverage, which has increased access to surgical care for many conditions. We hypothesized that socioeconomic disparities in access to robotic repair of non-elective emergency general surgery (EGS) hernias are less prevalent in California, a Medicaid expansion state, compared to Florida, which has not adopted Medicaid expansion.

METHODS

The 2021 California and Florida State Inpatient Databases were used to identify all EGS admissions with an ICD-10 procedure code for ventral or inguinal hernia repair. Elective procedures and those with concurrent unrelated abdominal procedures were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidity burden, payor status, and income quartile were abstracted. Aggregation of hospital data identified high-volume trauma, robotic, and EGS centers.

RESULTS

There were 15,683 EGS hernia procedures of which 11% underwent robotic repair: 14% in Florida and 8% in California. On multivariable logistic regression, older age, male sex, lower income, and Medicare insurance were associated with reduced odds of robotic hernia repair in California, but not in Florida, despite an uninsured rate of 10%. The greatest predictor of robotic surgery in both states was treatment at a robotic surgery center. Overall, accounting for patient- and hospital-level factors, hernia surgeries in Florida were more likely to involve robotics (OR 1.61, CI 1.42-1.81, p < 0.001) compared to California.

CONCLUSION

There were fewer disparities in access to EGS robotic hernia repairs in Florida than in California. This suggests that robotic surgery access for EGS hernia repairs is primarily determined by institutional adoption of robotic surgery, not income or payor status. Compared to California, Florida appears to have greater market penetration of robotic surgery, which has increased access to robotic EGS for all patients.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,获得机器人手术的机会受到社会经济因素的影响,包括保险状况。2010 年《平价医疗法案》为各州扩大医疗补助覆盖范围开辟了道路,这增加了许多疾病的手术护理机会。我们假设,在加利福尼亚州(一个扩大了医疗补助的州),与没有扩大医疗补助的佛罗里达州相比,非选择性紧急普通外科(EGS)疝的机器人修复机会的社会经济差异较小。

方法

使用 2021 年加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州州立住院患者数据库,确定所有 ICD-10 手术代码为腹侧或腹股沟疝修复的 EGS 入院病例。排除择期手术和同时进行的无关腹部手术。提取患者人口统计学、合并症负担、支付者身份和收入四分位数。汇总医院数据确定了高容量创伤、机器人和 EGS 中心。

结果

共有 15683 例 EGS 疝手术,其中 11%接受机器人修复:佛罗里达州为 14%,加利福尼亚州为 8%。在多变量逻辑回归中,加利福尼亚州,年龄较大、男性、收入较低和医疗保险与机器人疝修复的可能性降低相关,但在佛罗里达州并非如此,尽管未参保率为 10%。在这两个州,机器人手术的最大预测因素都是在机器人手术中心接受治疗。总体而言,考虑到患者和医院层面的因素,佛罗里达州的疝手术更有可能涉及机器人手术(OR 1.61,95%CI 1.42-1.81,p<0.001),而不是加利福尼亚州。

结论

佛罗里达州 EGS 机器人疝修复的获得机会差异较小。这表明,EGS 疝修复的机器人手术机会主要由机构采用机器人手术决定,而不是收入或支付者身份。与加利福尼亚州相比,佛罗里达州似乎具有更大的机器人手术市场渗透率,这增加了所有患者获得机器人 EGS 的机会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验