Suppr超能文献

长双歧杆菌 KABP042 联合戊糖片球菌 KABP041 益生菌混合物与雷特氏乳杆菌 DSM17938 治疗婴儿绞痛的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。

Comparative efficacy of probiotic mixture Bifidobacterium longum KABP042 plus Pediococcus pentosaceus KABP041 vs. Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the management of infant colic: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.

Service of Pediatrics, Hospital Medica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5371-5381. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05806-x. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We aimed to compare the efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum KABP042 + Pediococcus pentosaceus KABP041 (BL + PP) vs. Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 (LR) in alleviating the symptoms of infant colic, as commercially available formulations. A randomized, multicenter, parallel, single-blind (investigator) trial was conducted in 112 colicky infants diagnosed as per Rome IV criteria and randomly allocated to receive BL + PP orally (10 colony-forming units [CFU]/day, n = 55) or LR (10 CFU/day, n = 57) for 21 days. Primary study outcomes were percentage of responders (≥ 50% reduction in crying and fussing time from baseline, as reported by parents in a structured diary) and daily crying and fussing time (minutes/day) on days 7, 14, and 21 after randomization. Study groups were comparable at baseline. Responder rate was significantly higher in BP + PP group vs. LR group at days 7 (61.1% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.013) and 14 (84.6% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.004). Crying and fussing time (median [IQR]) became significantly lower in BL + PP group vs. LR group on day 7 (119 [60-210] vs. 180 [110-270]; p = 0.028), day 14 (60.0 [30-105] vs. 120 [60-180]; p = 0.017), and day 21 (29 [0-85] vs. 67 [30-165]; p = 0.011). No significant differences were found in the number of adverse events between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The specific formulation of B. longum KABP042 and P. pentosaceus KABP041 achieved a higher response rate and a larger reduction in crying and fussing time in colicky infants. Both probiotic interventions were well tolerated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered as NCT05271747 on February 28th, 2022.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• L. reuteri DSM17938 (LR) is the most researched probiotic strain for infant colic against placebo in randomized, controlled clinical trials, and is recommended in various guidelines. A novel probiotic combining strains B. longum KABP042 and P. pentosaceus KABP041 (BL + PP) has also demonstrated efficacy in infant colic against placebo.

WHAT IS NEW

• This randomized study provides the first direct comparison of two probiotics for infant colic. BL + PP seems to be superior to LR in reducing crying time.

摘要

目的

比较双歧杆菌 KABP042+戊糖片球菌 KABP041(BL+PP)与雷特氏乳杆菌 DSM17938(LR)在缓解婴儿绞痛症状方面的疗效,两者均为市售配方。采用随机、多中心、平行、单盲(研究者)试验,纳入符合罗马 IV 标准的 112 例绞痛婴儿,随机分为口服 BL+PP(10 菌落形成单位[CFU]/天,n=55)或 LR(10 CFU/天,n=57),疗程 21 天。主要研究结局为父母在结构化日记中报告的≥50%减少哭闹时间的应答率(%)和随机分组后第 7、14 和 21 天的每日哭闹时间(分钟/天)。两组基线可比。与 LR 组相比,BP+PP 组在第 7 天(61.1%比 37.5%,p=0.013)和第 14 天(84.6%比 59.3%,p=0.004)的应答率显著更高。与 LR 组相比,BL+PP 组在第 7 天(119[60-210]比 180[110-270];p=0.028)、第 14 天(60.0[30-105]比 120[60-180];p=0.017)和第 21 天(29[0-85]比 67[30-165];p=0.011)的哭闹时间(中位数[IQR])显著降低。两组不良反应发生率无显著差异。

结论

特定的长双歧杆菌 KABP042 和戊糖片球菌 KABP041 配方在绞痛婴儿中达到了更高的应答率,并更大程度地减少了哭闹时间。两种益生菌干预均耐受良好。

试验注册

该研究于 2022 年 2 月 28 日在临床试验注册平台(NCT05271747)进行了回顾性注册。

已知

• 雷特氏乳杆菌 DSM17938(LR)是在随机对照临床试验中针对安慰剂治疗婴儿绞痛最受研究的益生菌菌株,且在各种指南中均有推荐。一种新型益生菌,由长双歧杆菌 KABP042 和戊糖片球菌 KABP041(BL+PP)组成,也已证明对安慰剂治疗婴儿绞痛有效。

新发现

• 本随机研究首次对两种治疗婴儿绞痛的益生菌进行了直接比较。BL+PP 在减少哭闹时间方面似乎优于 LR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b2/11527960/9cd6a0b554b7/431_2024_5806_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验