• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Demonstration of Clostridium difficile and toxin B in patients at a university clinic].

作者信息

Heizmann W, Heeg P, Liebig B, Botzenhart K

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1985 Dec;182(1):25-32.

PMID:3939049
Abstract

107 stool specimens from not hospitalized individuals and 69 stool specimens from 61 hospitalized patients (Internal Medicine) were examined for C. difficile and toxin B. Included were 42 specimens of 33 female patients of the department of maxillo-facial surgery, receiving prophylactic clindamycin and 7 samples from the ward staff. From the samples of the first group, C. difficile was isolated in one case (0.93%), whereas 8 out of 61 internal patients (13%) were positive for C. difficile by culture and/or toxin test. In 12 out of 33 surgical patients (36%), C. difficile and/or toxin could be detected in the stool. Examination of the ward staff was negative. Environmental samplings on the ward, comprehending 246 contact cultures, resulted in the isolation of C. difficile from 25 plates (10.1%). The majority of the patients showed no symptoms or slight diarrhea. Only 5 patients required vancomycin therapy. Frequency and clinical significance of C. difficile isolation is discussed under these aspects.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Demonstration of Clostridium difficile and toxin B in patients at a university clinic].
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1985 Dec;182(1):25-32.
2
Analysis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea among patients hospitalized in tertiary care academic hospital.三级医疗学术医院住院患者艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的分析
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jun;52(2):153-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.12.015.
3
[Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the stools of hospitalized patients with diarrhea].[从腹泻住院患者粪便中分离艰难梭菌]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):672-5.
4
[Investigation of the presence of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic associated diarrhea patients by culture and toxin detection methods].[采用培养和毒素检测方法调查抗生素相关性腹泻患者中艰难梭菌的存在情况]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Jan;41(1):29-37.
5
Lack of value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxin.艰难梭菌毒素重复粪便检测的价值缺失
Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4):356.e7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.08.026.
6
Evaluation of different methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in Poland.波兰不同艰难梭菌毒素检测方法的评估。
Acta Microbiol Pol. 1999;48(4):349-53.
7
[Clostridium difficile diarrhea: frequency of detection in a medical center in Buenos Aires, Argentina].[艰难梭菌腹泻:在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯一家医疗中心的检出频率]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2001 Apr-Jun;33(2):101-7.
8
[The frequency of Clostridium difficile toxin in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea and analysis of the risk factors].[中性粒细胞减少和非中性粒细胞减少的抗生素相关性腹泻患者中艰难梭菌毒素的频率及危险因素分析]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Oct;42(4):573-83.
9
Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.对提交用于艰难梭菌相关性腹泻诊断的粪便标本中毒素检测方法的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Aug;39(8):2846-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2846-2849.2001.
10
Isolation rates and toxigenic potential of Clostridium difficile isolates from various patient populations.来自不同患者群体的艰难梭菌分离株的分离率和产毒潜力。
Gastroenterology. 1981 Jul;81(1):5-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Infections after experimental cadaver bone marrow transplantation in beagle dogs. Transplantations with and without selective gastrointestinal decontamination.
Infection. 1988;16(1):36-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01646930.
2
Surveillance cultures and benefit of laminar airflow units in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.
Infection. 1987;15(5):337-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01647734.