Zheng Xiaozhuo, Lu Lixiong, Ma Mengyi, Lei Xiaofeng
Department of Anesthesiology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 26;11:1481083. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1481083. eCollection 2024.
Extubation failure (EF) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with poor prognosis, especially in high-risk patients. However, the efficacy of prophylactic noninvasive oxygen therapy (NIT), including noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in reducing EF in high-risk patients remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of post-extubation prophylactic NIT on EF in high-risk patients.
This was a retrospective observational study conducted in the ICU from March 2018 to December 2023. We included adult patients at high risk for reintubation who were mechanically ventilated for over 24 h and successfully passed the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Immediately after extubation, patients underwent NIT or conventional oxygenation therapy (COT). The primary outcome was the EF rate within 7 days after extubation.
There were 440 patients in the NIT group and 274 in the COT group. After propensity-score matching, 227 subjects were enrolled in each group. NIT reduced the rate of EF (18.0% vs. 34.3%, < 0.001) and reintubation (10.5% vs. 18.2% = 0.003) compared with COT, which was confirmed in propensity-matched cohort (17.6% vs. 32.2%, < 0.001; 11.5% vs. 19.8%, = 0.014). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that prophylactic NIT ( = 0.001) and higher ROX index ( = 0.022) were associated with reduced risk of EF. While higher fluid balance ( = 0.013), higher RSBI ( < 0.001), and the occurrence of delirium ( = 0.032) may be the risk factors for EF. Subgroup analysis showed that post-extubation NIT was more effective in elderly patients, and HFNC was non-inferior to NIV in reducing EF. While HFNC had a tendency to reduce the incidence of delirium.
Post-extubation prophylactic NIT is effective in reducing EF in high-risk patients, especially in the elderly patients. HFNC is an alternative treatment to NIV. Fluid balance, RSBI, ROX index, and delirium are associated with the occurrence of EF.
拔管失败(EF)在重症监护病房(ICU)中很常见,且与预后不良相关,尤其是在高危患者中。然而,预防性无创氧疗(NIT),包括无创通气(NIV)和高流量鼻导管吸氧(HFNC),在降低高危患者拔管失败率方面的疗效仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在评估拔管后预防性NIT对高危患者拔管失败的影响。
这是一项于2018年3月至2023年12月在ICU进行的回顾性观察研究。我们纳入了有再次插管高风险、机械通气超过24小时且成功通过自主呼吸试验(SBT)的成年患者。拔管后,患者立即接受NIT或传统氧疗(COT)。主要结局是拔管后7天内的拔管失败率。
NIT组有440例患者,COT组有274例患者。经过倾向得分匹配后,每组纳入227名受试者。与COT相比,NIT降低了拔管失败率(18.0%对34.3%,<0.001)和再次插管率(10.5%对18.2%,=0.003),这在倾向得分匹配队列中得到证实(17.6%对32.2%,<0.001;11.5%对19.8%,=0.014)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,预防性NIT(=0.001)和较高的ROX指数(=0.022)与降低拔管失败风险相关。而较高的液体平衡(=0.013)、较高的快速浅呼吸指数(<0.001)和谵妄的发生(=0.032)可能是拔管失败的危险因素。亚组分析表明,拔管后NIT在老年患者中更有效,且HFNC在降低拔管失败率方面不劣于NIV。同时,HFNC有降低谵妄发生率的趋势。
拔管后预防性NIT对降低高危患者尤其是老年患者的拔管失败有效。HFNC是NIV的替代治疗方法。液体平衡、快速浅呼吸指数、ROX指数和谵妄与拔管失败的发生相关。