• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在左心室射血分数改善的心脏再同步治疗患者中,B型利钠肽水平升高作为室性心律失常的残余危险因素。

Elevated B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Level as a Residual Risk Factor for Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

作者信息

Kamoshida Junichi, Ueda Nobuhiko, Ishibashi Kohei, Noda Takashi, Kawabata Takanori, Oka Satoshi, Miyazaki Yuichiro, Wakamiya Akinori, Nakajima Kenzaburo, Kamakura Tsukasa, Wada Mitsuru, Inoue Yuko, Miyamoto Koji, Nagase Satoshi, Aiba Takeshi, Kanzaki Hideaki, Izumi Chisato, Noguchi Teruo, Kusano Kengo

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.

Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2024 Sep 14;6(10):407-414. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0065. eCollection 2024 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0065
PMID:39391552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11464021/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who achieve improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >35%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are at a lower risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Little is known about the significance of the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level for the risk of VA. This study investigated the risk factors for VA in CRT and the risk stratification of VA with BNP in CRT with improved LVEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study evaluated 352 CRT patients from 2012 to 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: improved LVEF (impEF; LVEF >35%), and low LVEF (lowEF; LVEF ≤35%). The serum BNP levels 6 months after CRT device implantation were measured. The primary endpoint was defined as VA requiring treatment with anti-tachycardia pacing or shock or persisting for ≥30 s. Overall, 102 patients had improved LVEF. The impEF group had a significantly lower VA risk than the lowEF group. Patients with low BNP had a lower VA risk than those with high BNP; however, no significant difference was observed between patients with high BNP and those in the lowEF group. Univariate analysis revealed that high BNP was a predictor of VA in the impEF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The VA risk is reduced with improved LVEF after CRT but not with high BNP levels. The post-BNP level after CRT implantation is a useful marker for predicting VA in patients with improved LVEF.

摘要

背景

通过心脏再同步治疗(CRT)使左心室射血分数提高(LVEF>35%)的患者发生室性心律失常(VA)的风险较低。关于B型利钠肽(BNP)水平对VA风险的意义知之甚少。本研究调查了CRT中VA的危险因素以及BNP对LVEF改善的CRT患者VA的风险分层。

方法与结果

本研究评估了2012年至2020年的352例CRT患者。患者分为两组:LVEF改善组(impEF;LVEF>35%)和LVEF低组(lowEF;LVEF≤35%)。测量CRT设备植入后6个月的血清BNP水平。主要终点定义为需要抗心动过速起搏或电击治疗或持续≥30秒的VA。总体而言,102例患者的LVEF得到改善。impEF组的VA风险显著低于lowEF组。BNP低的患者比BNP高的患者VA风险更低;然而,BNP高的患者与lowEF组患者之间未观察到显著差异。单因素分析显示,高BNP是impEF组VA的预测因素。

结论

CRT后LVEF改善可降低VA风险,但BNP水平升高则不能。CRT植入后BNP水平是预测LVEF改善患者VA的有用标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/0b0959697024/circrep-6-407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/172d74b51de0/circrep-6-407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/a7c4b6954145/circrep-6-407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/0b0959697024/circrep-6-407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/172d74b51de0/circrep-6-407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/a7c4b6954145/circrep-6-407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7072/11464021/0b0959697024/circrep-6-407-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Elevated B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Level as a Residual Risk Factor for Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.在左心室射血分数改善的心脏再同步治疗患者中,B型利钠肽水平升高作为室性心律失常的残余危险因素。
Circ Rep. 2024 Sep 14;6(10):407-414. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0065. eCollection 2024 Oct 10.
2
Improvement of left ventricular function under cardiac resynchronization therapy goes along with a reduced incidence of ventricular arrhythmia.心脏再同步治疗可改善左心室功能,同时降低室性心律失常的发生率。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048926. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
3
Usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide level at implant in predicting mortality in patients with advanced but stable heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中晚期但稳定心力衰竭患者植入时脑利钠肽水平对死亡率的预测作用。
Clin Cardiol. 2009 Nov;32(11):E33-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20490.
4
Left ventricular ejection fraction normalization in cardiac resynchronization therapy and risk of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcomes: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial.心脏再同步治疗中左心室射血分数的正常化与室性心律失常和临床结局的风险:来自多中心自动除颤器植入试验与心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2278-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011283. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
5
A new biomarker of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: cGMP to mature BNP ratio.一种新的心脏再同步治疗反应生物标志物:cGMP 与成熟 BNP 的比值。
J Cardiol. 2022 Jun;79(6):727-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.12.015. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Brain natriuretic peptide and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT.脑利钠肽与轻度症状心力衰竭患者在 MADIT-CRT 中发生室性心动过速/心室颤动风险。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):852-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.024. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
7
The influence of left ventricular ejection fraction on the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy: MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).左心室射血分数对心脏再同步治疗效果的影响:MADIT-CRT(心脏再同步治疗的多中心自动除颤器植入试验)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):936-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.051.
8
Different impact of aortic regurgitation assessed by aortic root angiography after transcatheter aortic valve implantation according to baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.根据基线左心室射血分数和N末端B型利钠肽原,经导管主动脉瓣植入术后通过主动脉根部血管造影评估主动脉瓣反流的不同影响。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Jul;33(3):232-238. doi: 10.1007/s12928-017-0473-x. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Risk of ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy responders and super-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏再同步治疗应答者和超应答者室性心律失常风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2021 Aug 6;23(8):1262-1274. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa414.
10
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.随机试验:左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心脏再同步治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical impacts of sacubitril/valsartan on patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对适合心脏再同步治疗患者的临床影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Dec;9(6):3825-3835. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14107. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2019年心律失常非药物治疗指南》
Circ J. 2021 Jun 25;85(7):1104-1244. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0637. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With and Without Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The COAPT Trial.
经导管二尖瓣修复术在伴有和不伴有心脏再同步治疗的患者中的应用:COAPT 试验。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;13(11):e007293. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007293. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
The role of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders: a retrospective analysis.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心脏再同步治疗无反应者管理中的作用:一项回顾性分析
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):4404-4407. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12988. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Optimizing heart failure treatment following cardiac resynchronization therapy.优化心脏再同步治疗后的心力衰竭治疗。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 May;109(5):638-645. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01553-4. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy May Be Antiarrhythmic Particularly in Responders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心脏再同步治疗可能具有抗心律失常作用,尤其是在有反应者中:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jun;2(3):307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Effect of Left Ventricular Size and QRS Duration in Left Bundle Branch Block.性别对心脏再同步治疗的反应:左束支传导阻滞中左心室大小和 QRS 持续时间的影响。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):844-853. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
The interaction of sex, height, and QRS duration on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality: an individual-patient data meta-analysis.性别、身高和 QRS 持续时间对心脏再同步治疗的发病率和死亡率影响的相互作用:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):780-791. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1133. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Association of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators With Survival in Patients With and Without Improved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器与射血分数改善和未改善的心力衰竭患者生存的相关性:心力衰竭猝死试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):767-774. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1413.
10
Meta-analysis of Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias After Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Follow-Up in Patients With Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.原发性预防植入式心脏复律除颤器患者随访期间左心室射血分数改善后室性心律失常风险的Meta分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):279-286. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 27.