Pacella Stephen R, Brown Cheryl A, Kaldy James E, Labiosa Rochelle G, Hales Burke, Collura T Chris Mochon, Waldbusser George G
Pacific Coastal Ecology Branch, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Newport, OR, United States.
Region 10, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA, United States.
Front Mar Sci. 2024 Feb 2;11:1293955. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1293955.
The impacts of ocean acidification (OA) on coastal water quality have been subject to intensive research in the past decade, but how emissions-driven OA combines with human modifications of coastal river inputs to affect estuarine acidification dynamics is less well understood. This study presents a methodology for quantifying the synergistic water quality impacts of OA and riverine acidification on biologically-relevant timescales through a case study from a small, temperate estuary influenced by coastal upwelling and watershed development. We characterized the dynamics and drivers of carbonate chemistry in Tillamook Bay, OR (USA), along with its coastal ocean and riverine end-members, through a series of synoptic samplings and continuous water quality monitoring from July 2017 to July 2018. Synoptic river sampling showed acidification and increased content in areas with higher proportions of watershed anthropogenic land use. We propagated the impacts of 1). the observed riverine acidification, and 2). modeled OA changes to incoming coastal ocean waters across the full estuarine salinity spectrum and quantified changes in estuarine carbonate chemistry at a 15-minute temporal resolution. The largest magnitude of acidification (-1.4 units) was found in oligo- and mesohaline portions of the estuary due to the poor buffering characteristics of these waters, and was primarily driven by acidified riverine inputs. Despite this, emissions-driven OA is responsible for over 94% of anthropogenic carbon loading to Tillamook Bay and the dominant driver of acidification across most of the estuary due to its large tidal prism and relatively small river discharges. This dominance of ocean-sourced anthropogenic carbon challenges the efficacy of local management actions to ameliorate estuarine acidification impacts. Despite the relatively large acidification effects experienced in Tillamook Bay (-0.16 to -0.23 units) as compared with typical open ocean change (approximately -0.1 units), observations of estuarine would meet existing state standards for . Our analytical framework addresses pressing needs for water quality assessment and coastal resilience strategies to differentiate the impacts of anthropogenic acidification from natural variability in dynamic estuarine systems.
在过去十年中,海洋酸化(OA)对沿海水质的影响一直是深入研究的课题,但由排放驱动的海洋酸化如何与人类对沿海河流输入的改变相结合,从而影响河口酸化动态,目前还不太清楚。本研究通过一个受沿海上升流和流域开发影响的小型温带河口的案例研究,提出了一种在与生物相关的时间尺度上量化海洋酸化和河流酸化协同水质影响的方法。我们通过2017年7月至2018年7月的一系列综合采样和连续水质监测,对美国俄勒冈州蒂拉穆克湾及其沿海海洋和河流端点的碳酸盐化学动态和驱动因素进行了表征。综合河流采样显示,在流域人为土地利用比例较高的地区出现了酸化和[具体物质]含量增加的情况。我们将1)观测到的河流酸化影响,以及2)模拟的海洋酸化对进入沿海海洋水体的变化,扩展到整个河口盐度谱,并以15分钟的时间分辨率量化河口碳酸盐化学的变化。由于这些水域的缓冲特性较差,在河口的寡盐和中盐部分发现了最大程度的酸化(-1.4[具体单位]),并且主要是由酸化的河流输入驱动的。尽管如此,由于其大潮差和相对较小的河流流量,由排放驱动的海洋酸化导致进入蒂拉穆克湾的人为碳负荷超过94%,并且是整个河口大部分地区酸化的主要驱动因素。这种来自海洋的人为碳的主导地位对当地管理行动减轻河口酸化影响的效果提出了挑战。尽管与典型的开阔海洋变化(约-0.1[具体单位])相比,蒂拉穆克湾经历了相对较大的酸化效应(-0.16至-0.23[具体单位]),但河口[相关物质]的观测结果仍符合现有的[相关物质]国家标准。我们的分析框架满足了水质评估和沿海复原力策略的迫切需求,以区分人为酸化与动态河口系统中自然变化的影响。