Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2024 Dec;33(6):387-395. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2413113. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic band electrocision ligation (EEL) in the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs).
We analyzed the clinical data of 130 patients with gastrointestinal SMTs (diameter ≤10 mm) who underwent endoscopic resection, including 62 cases in the EEL group and 68 in the ESD group, and compared indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and surgical cost, between the EEL and ESD group.
EEL surgery time (8.9 ± 1.1 min) was significantly shorter than the ESD group (62.3 ± 2.8 min) ( < .05), EEL surgery cost (5126.8 ± 26.5 yuan) was significantly lower than the ESD group (15721.3 ± 39.6 yuan) ( < .05), and intraoperative blood loss was also markedly lower in the EEL group (5.6 ± 1.7 ml) compared to the ESD group (42.3 ± 3.5 ml) ( < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time or postoperative complication incidence between the two groups ( > .05).
In treating gastric muscular, mucosal, or submucosal tumors with a diameter of less than 10 mm, the EEL surgical method was superior to the ESD surgical method in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two methods, which was worthy of clinical application.
本研究旨在比较和分析内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与内镜套扎电切术(EEL)治疗胃黏膜下肿瘤(SMT)的临床效果。
回顾性分析我院 130 例胃肠 SMT(直径≤10mm)患者的内镜下切除治疗资料,其中 EEL 组 62 例,ESD 组 68 例,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中及术后并发症、术后住院时间、手术费用等指标。
EEL 组手术时间(8.9±1.1min)显著短于 ESD 组(62.3±2.8min)(<0.05),EEL 组手术费用(5126.8±26.5 元)显著低于 ESD 组(15721.3±39.6 元)(<0.05),术中出血量(5.6±1.7ml)也显著少于 ESD 组(42.3±3.5ml)(<0.05)。两组患者术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。
对于直径<10mm 的胃固有肌层、黏膜层或黏膜下肿瘤,EEL 手术方法在手术时间、术中出血量和费用方面优于 ESD 手术方法。两种方法在住院时间和术后并发症发生率方面无差异,值得临床应用。