Harrison Laura C, Rivas Silvia, Fuentes Lucia, Cáceres-Serrano Ana, Ferrara Gia, Antillon-Klussmann Federico, Rodriguez-Galindo Carlos, Mack Jennifer W, Graetz Dylan E
Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Department of Palliative Care, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 11;4(10):e0003813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003813. eCollection 2024.
Explanatory models (EMs) are used in medical anthropology to characterize individual understandings of illness. This study investigated how interdisciplinary clinical interactions elicited caregiver EMs at a pediatric cancer center in Guatemala. This qualitative study included caregivers of 20 children with newly diagnosed cancer at Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP) in Guatemala City, Guatemala. UNOP's diagnostic process includes social work intake, psychoeducation with a psychologist, and a diagnostic conversation with an oncologist and psychologist. Audio-recordings from the diagnostic process and a semi-structured interview were obtained, transcribed, and translated from Spanish. Transcripts were coded using a priori codes based on the five explanatory model (EM) components (occurrence, causation, pathophysiology, course of sickness, and treatment), as well as disease, and illness accounts. Thematic content analysis explored the EM framework as applied to diagnostic interactions between families and clinicians. All five components of the EM were addressed during the diagnostic process at UNOP. Clinicians, particularly psychologists, initiated conversation about the EM more than caregivers. When prompted, caregivers discussed all aspects of the EM but only rarely mentioned pathophysiology. Disease accounts were primarily described by clinicians, while caregivers used illness accounts to describe cancer causation. Clinicians validated existence of both disease and illness accounts. UNOP's interdisciplinary team elicited families' beliefs and facilitated in-depth discussion of all aspects of the EM, leading to a shared understanding of cancer and its treatment. Utilizing the EM framework in clinical practice may support culturally-competent pediatric cancer care.
解释模型(EMs)在医学人类学中用于描述个体对疾病的理解。本研究调查了在危地马拉的一家儿科癌症中心,跨学科临床互动如何引出照顾者的解释模型。这项定性研究纳入了危地马拉城国家儿科肿瘤学单位(UNOP)20名新诊断为癌症儿童的照顾者。UNOP的诊断过程包括社会工作接待、与心理学家进行心理教育,以及与肿瘤学家和心理学家进行诊断谈话。获取了诊断过程的录音和一次半结构化访谈,进行了转录,并从西班牙语进行了翻译。基于五个解释模型(EM)组成部分(发生、病因、病理生理学、疾病进程和治疗)以及疾病和患病描述,使用先验编码对转录本进行编码。主题内容分析探讨了应用于家庭与临床医生之间诊断互动的解释模型框架。在UNOP的诊断过程中涉及到了解释模型的所有五个组成部分。临床医生,尤其是心理学家,比照顾者更多地发起关于解释模型的谈话。当受到提示时,照顾者讨论了解释模型的所有方面,但很少提及病理生理学。疾病描述主要由临床医生进行,而照顾者用患病描述来阐述癌症病因。临床医生认可疾病描述和患病描述的存在。UNOP的跨学科团队引出了家庭的信念,并促进了对解释模型所有方面的深入讨论,从而达成了对癌症及其治疗的共同理解。在临床实践中运用解释模型框架可能有助于提供具有文化胜任力的儿科癌症护理。