• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾切除术对胃癌胃切除术后长期结局的影响:一项基于人群的研究。

Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study.

作者信息

Junttila Anna, Helminen Olli, Helmiö Mika, Huhta Heikki, Jalkanen Aapo, Kallio Raija, Koivukangas Vesa, Kokkola Arto, Laine Simo, Lietzen Elina, Louhimo Johanna, Meriläinen Sanna, Pohjanen Vesa-Matti, Rantanen Tuomo, Ristimäki Ari, Räsänen Jari V, Saarnio Juha, Sihvo Eero, Toikkanen Vesa, Tyrväinen Tuula, Valtola Antti, Kauppila Joonas H

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec;28(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009
PMID:39393772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting.

METHODS

This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation.

CONCLUSION

The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.

摘要

背景

目前尚无全国性研究比较因损伤或肿瘤原因行全胃或部分胃切除联合脾切除术后的长期生存率,也没有关于保留脾脏的研究。本研究旨在探讨在全国范围内基于人群的情况下,因损伤或肿瘤原因行全胃或部分胃切除联合脾切除或保留脾脏的胃腺癌患者的5年总生存率(OS)。

方法

本研究纳入了2005年至2016年在芬兰因胃腺癌行全胃或部分胃切除联合脾切除或保留脾脏的所有患者,随访至2019年12月31日。在登记处共识别出2196例诊断为胃癌并接受全胃或部分胃切除的患者。其中,2118例患者适用于本研究。Cox比例风险模型提供了5年OS的风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)。结果根据年龄、性别、手术年份、合并症、肿瘤位置、病理分期和新辅助治疗进行了调整。

结果

无或轻度脾损伤患者的观察到的5年OS率为38.7%,因损伤行脾切除的患者为39.7%,因肿瘤原因行脾切除的患者为30.8%(P = 0.032)。因肿瘤原因行R0胃切除联合脾切除的患者5年死亡率高于保留脾脏的患者(校正模型HR,1.26;95%CI,1.01 - 1.56)。

结论

因肿瘤原因行胃切除联合脾切除的患者OS最差,突出了晚期胃癌患者的预后不良。因损伤行脾切除不会影响预后。

相似文献

1
Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study.脾切除术对胃癌胃切除术后长期结局的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec;28(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Oncologic Effectiveness and Safety of Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全胃切除术治疗近端胃癌时脾切除术的肿瘤学疗效与安全性:随机对照试验的Meta分析
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jun;38(6):3609-3617. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12635.
3
Splenectomy versus splenic preservation in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing survival benefits and short-term complications.全胃切除术中脾切除术与保脾术治疗胃癌:一项比较生存获益和短期并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med. 2024 Apr;136(3):266-277. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2024.2333233. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
The effect of spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy on surgical outcomes of locally advanced proximal gastric cancer.保脾淋巴结清扫术对局部进展期近端胃癌手术疗效的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;99(5):275-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.21229.
5
Spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy versus splenectomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.进展期胃癌腹腔镜全胃切除术中保留脾脏的淋巴结清扫术与脾切除术的比较
Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;26(2):207-211. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma.评估近端胃癌全胃切除术中脾切除术的随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):277-283. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001814.
7
The value of spleen-preserving lymphadenectomy in total gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas: A long-term retrospective propensity score match study from a high-volume institution in China.保留脾脏的淋巴结清扫术在全胃切除治疗胃及胃食管结合部腺癌中的价值:来自中国一家大容量医疗机构的长期回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Surgery. 2021 Feb;169(2):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction: A Population-Based Study.胃癌根治术后经结肠前与结肠后吻合的术后并发症比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5263-5272. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15415-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
9
Prognostic significance of splenectomy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.胃腺癌患者行全胃切除术后脾切除术的预后意义:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Preservation of the spleen improves survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer.保留脾脏可提高胃癌根治术后的生存率。
Gut. 1995 May;36(5):684-90. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.5.684.