Alhalabi Feras
Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul-Aziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Eur J Dent. 2025 Feb;19(1):55-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787283. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
This article evaluates the etching efficacy of a self-etching ceramic primer (SECP) on zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramics.
Celtra Duo (DeguDent GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany) and Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) were used in this study. A total of 36 ceramic slices were prepared from each ceramic material and randomly distributed into three groups according to the surface treatment applied ( = 12 per group). Group 1 (polished) was polished with silicon carbide paper discs and did not undergo any surface treatment; group 2 (SECP) was surface treated with SECP (Monobond Etch and Prime, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein); group 3 (hydrofluoric acid [HF]) was surface treated with 4.7% HF etching. Half of the specimens ( = 6) from each group were gold-sputtered, and the surface topographic alterations were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy at magnifications of 5,000× and 10,000 × . The surface roughness of the other half ( = 6) from each group was tested using a three-dimensional optical profiler. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparisons test.
Both SECP and HF etching surface treatments resulted in a statistically significant increase ( < 0.05) in the surface roughness of both ceramic materials, compared to that of their respective control group specimens (polished). HF etching resulted in a significant dissolution of the glassy phase of each ceramic.
SECP can effectively etch ZLS ceramics. The etching patterns created after the application of SECP were mild compared to those produced by HF etching. The topographic surface features of ceramics are affected by both, surface treatment and material composition.
本文评估自酸蚀陶瓷底漆(SECP)对氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS)陶瓷的酸蚀效果。
本研究使用了Celtra Duo(德国迪古里拉公司,哈瑙 - 沃尔夫冈)和维他Suprinity(德国维他齿科公司,巴特萨金根)。从每种陶瓷材料制备了总共36个陶瓷片,并根据所应用的表面处理随机分为三组(每组 = 12个)。第1组(抛光组)用碳化硅纸盘抛光,未进行任何表面处理;第2组(SECP组)用SECP(单组分蚀刻和底漆,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司,沙恩,列支敦士登)进行表面处理;第3组(氢氟酸[HF]组)用4.7%的HF蚀刻进行表面处理。每组一半的标本( = 6个)进行金溅射,并通过放大倍数为5000倍和10000倍的扫描电子显微镜评估表面形貌变化。使用三维光学轮廓仪测试每组另一半( = 6个)的表面粗糙度。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学分析。
与各自对照组标本(抛光组)相比,SECP和HF蚀刻表面处理均导致两种陶瓷材料的表面粗糙度有统计学意义的增加( < 0.05)。HF蚀刻导致每种陶瓷的玻璃相显著溶解。
SECP可有效蚀刻ZLS陶瓷。与HF蚀刻产生的蚀刻图案相比,应用SECP后产生的蚀刻图案较轻微。陶瓷的表面形貌特征受表面处理和材料成分两者的影响。