Nic Giolla Easpaig Bróna, Lindeman Melissa A, Watson Penny, Liu Xianliang
Charles Darwin Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia.
The Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2024 Dec;32(6):1118-1139. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13192. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
Growing the mental health peer workforce holds promise for rural communities, but we currently lack an understanding of the guidance available to support the development, implementation and sustainability of this workforce in rural settings.
Study aims are to: (1) determine the extent and nature of the literature that provides guidance for growing the peer workforce in rural mental health services; and (2) identify and explore any guidance relevant to rural peer work services dedicated to First Nations communities, including those promoting social and emotional well-being within this body of literature.
A scoping review method was employed to identify relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2013 and 2022 across PsychInfo, Medline, Embase and CINAHL, Scopus and Informit HealthInfoNet databases, as well as targeted organisation websites and Google Advanced Search.
A total of 26 unique studies/projects were included from the US, UK, Canada and Australia with public mental health, non-government/for purpose and private sector service settings represented in the literature. Grey literature, such as reports of evaluations and frameworks, formed the majority of included texts. While there is a lesser volume of rurally focused literature relative to the general peer work literature, this is a rich body of knowledge, which includes guidance concerning services dedicated to First Nations communities. Via synthesis critical considerations were identified for the development, implementation and sustainability of peer work in rural mental health services across six domains: 'Working with community members and stakeholders', 'Organisational culture and governance', Working with others and in teams, Professional expertise and experience, Being part of and working in the community and 'Local mental health services capacity'.
While there are considerations relevant across a range of settings, the domains of: 'working with community members and stakeholders', 'being part of and working in the community' and 'local mental health services capacity', capture additional, distinct and nuanced challenges and opportunities for growing the peer work in rural services.
The literature offers insights valuable for service planning, policy development and the allocation of resources to support rural peer workforce growth.
壮大心理健康同伴工作队伍有望造福农村社区,但目前我们尚不清楚有哪些指导意见可支持这一队伍在农村地区的发展、实施和可持续性。
本研究旨在:(1)确定为壮大农村心理健康服务中的同伴工作队伍提供指导的文献的范围和性质;(2)识别并探讨与专门服务于原住民社区的农村同伴工作服务相关的任何指导意见,包括在该文献中促进社会和情感福祉的指导意见。
采用范围综述方法,在2013年至2022年期间发表于PsychInfo、Medline、Embase和CINAHL、Scopus以及Informit HealthInfoNet数据库的同行评审文献和灰色文献中,以及在目标组织网站和谷歌高级搜索中识别相关文献。
共纳入来自美国、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚的26项独特研究/项目,文献中涉及公共心理健康、非政府/公益和私营部门服务环境。灰色文献,如评估报告和框架,构成了纳入文本的大部分。虽然与一般同伴工作文献相比,以农村为重点的文献数量较少,但这是一个丰富的知识体系,其中包括有关专门服务于原住民社区的服务的指导意见。通过综合分析,确定了农村心理健康服务中同伴工作的发展、实施和可持续性在六个领域的关键考虑因素:“与社区成员和利益相关者合作”、“组织文化与治理”、“与他人合作及团队合作”、“专业知识与经验”、“融入社区并在社区工作”以及“当地心理健康服务能力”。
虽然在一系列环境中都有相关考虑因素,但“与社区成员和利益相关者合作”、“融入社区并在社区工作”以及“当地心理健康服务能力”等领域,为壮大农村服务中的同伴工作带来了额外的、独特的和细微的挑战与机遇。
这些文献为服务规划、政策制定以及支持农村同伴工作队伍发展的资源分配提供了宝贵的见解。