Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 12;42(1):575. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05267-9.
To assess the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes, within a large multicenter cohort of Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with Nephroureterectomy.
A multicenter retrospective analysis utilizing the Robotic surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Study registry was performed. Baseline, preoperative, perioperative, and pathologic variables of three groups of patients receiving surgery only, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. Categorical and continuous variables among the three subgroups were compared with Chi square and ANOVA tests. The impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes was assessed with the Kaplan Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival.
Overall, 1,994 patients were included. Overall and Clavien grade ≥3 complications rates were comparable among the three subgroups (p = 0.65 and p = 0.92). At Kaplan Meier analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved cancer-specific survival (p = 0.03) and overall survival (p = 0.03) probabilities of patients with cT ≥ 3 tumors and of those with positive cN (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with an improvement of cancer-specific survival in cT ≥ 3 patients (HR 0.44; p = 0.04), and of both cancer-specific survival (HR 0.50; p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.53; p = 0.02) probabilities in positive cN patients.
This large multicenter retrospective analysis suggests significant survival benefit in Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with either locally advanced or clinically positive nodes disease receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings can be regarded as "hypothesis generating", stimulating future trials focusing on such advanced stages.
在接受肾输尿管切除术的大型多中心上尿路上皮癌患者队列中,评估新辅助和辅助化疗对生存结果的影响。
利用机器人手术治疗上尿路上皮癌研究登记处进行了多中心回顾性分析。比较了仅接受手术、新辅助或辅助化疗的三组患者的基线、术前、围手术期和病理变量。使用卡方检验和方差分析比较了三个亚组之间的分类和连续变量。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估围手术期化疗对生存结果的影响。进行单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析以确定生存的预测因素。
总体而言,共纳入 1994 名患者。三组患者的总体和 Clavien 分级≥3 并发症发生率相似(p=0.65 和 p=0.92)。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,新辅助化疗显著改善了 cT≥3 肿瘤患者和 cN 阳性患者的癌症特异性生存(p=0.03)和总体生存(p=0.03)概率。在多变量分析中,新辅助化疗与 cT≥3 患者的癌症特异性生存改善独立相关(HR 0.44;p=0.04),以及 cN 阳性患者的癌症特异性生存(HR 0.50;p=0.03)和总体生存(HR 0.53;p=0.02)概率。
这项大型多中心回顾性分析表明,接受新辅助化疗的局部晚期或临床阳性淋巴结疾病的上尿路上皮癌患者具有显著的生存获益。这些发现可以被视为“假设产生”,激发了未来针对这些晚期阶段的试验。