Burger Joanna, Gochfeld Michael, Brown Kevin G, Cortes Monica, Ng Kelly, Kosson David
Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2025 Jan 2;88(1):1-19. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2024.2412659. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
There is a need to assess whether ecological resources are being protected on large, federal lands. The aim of this study was to present a methodology which consistently and transparently determines whether two large Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) facilities have protected valuable ecological lands on their sites compared to the surrounding region. The National Land Cover Database (2019) was used to examine the % shrub-scrub (shrub-steppe) and other habitats on the DOE's Hanford Site (HS, Washington) and on the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), compared to a 10-km and 30-km diameter band of land surrounding each site. On both sites, over 95% is in shrub-scrub or grassland, compared to the surrounding region. Approximately 70% of 10 km and 30-km bands around INL, and less than 50% of land surrounding HS is located in these two habitat types. INL has preserved a significantly higher % shrub/scrub habitat than HS, but INL allows grazing on 60% of its land. HS has preserved a significantly higher % grassland than INL but no grazing on site is present. The methodology presented may be used to compare key ecological habitat types such as grasslands, forest, and desert among sites in different parts of the country. This methodology enables managers, resource trustees, and the public to (1) make remediation decisions that protect resources, (2) assess whether landowners and managers have adequately characterized and protected environmental resources on their sites, and (3) whether landowners and managers have protected the integrity of that land as well as its climax vegetation.
有必要评估大型联邦土地上的生态资源是否得到了保护。本研究的目的是提出一种方法,该方法能够一致且透明地确定美国能源部(U.S. DOE)的两个大型设施与其周边地区相比,是否在其场地内保护了有价值的生态土地。利用国家土地覆盖数据库(2019年),将美国能源部汉福德基地(HS,华盛顿州)和爱达荷国家实验室(INL)的灌丛-矮灌丛(灌丛-草原)及其他栖息地的百分比,与每个场地周围直径10公里和30公里的土地带进行比较。与周边地区相比,这两个场地超过95%的土地为灌丛-矮灌丛或草地。INL周围10公里和30公里地带约70%的土地以及HS周围不到50%的土地属于这两种栖息地类型。INL保护的灌丛/矮灌丛栖息地百分比显著高于HS,但INL有60%的土地允许放牧。HS保护的草地百分比显著高于INL,但现场没有放牧。所提出的方法可用于比较美国不同地区各场地之间的关键生态栖息地类型,如草地、森林和沙漠。该方法使管理者、资源受托人及公众能够:(1)做出保护资源的修复决策;(2)评估土地所有者和管理者是否充分描述并保护了其场地内的环境资源;(3)土地所有者和管理者是否保护了该土地及其顶级植被的完整性。