Woelfle Catelyn A, Geller Jeffrey A, Neuwirth Alexander L, Sarpong Nana O, Shah Roshan P, John Cooper H
Department of Orthopedic Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York, NY, USA.
Knee. 2024 Dec;51:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.09.012. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
New cementless implant designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have begun to shift the longstanding practice of cemented fixation. With aseptic loosening a leading cause for revision of cementless implants, initial osteointegration is critical for component survivorship. Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) has shown promising results in recent literature at improving component accuracy. The current study aims to evaluate if robotic assistance affects the success of cementless fixation in primary TKA.
445 cementless primary TKA components from one manufacturer implanted by five surgeons between June 2018 and October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Those with minimum one-year follow-up were analyzed. Femoral and tibial components were reviewed separately and grouped based on whether manual or RA-TKA from the same manufacturer was performed. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze if aseptic loosening rates were different between the two techniques.
373 (82%) cementless components from a single knee system were included. 146 femoral and 103 tibial components were implanted using RA-TKA, while 63 femoral and 61 tibial components were implanted manually. At a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 12 to 51 months), successful fixation was achieved in 96.2% of all components. No femoral components from either group were revised due to aseptic loosening. Four manually implanted vs. no robotically assisted tibial components were revised due to aseptic loosening (6.6% vs 0.0%; P = 0.038).
The performance of modern cementless femoral components was excellent with or without robotic assistance, however RA-TKA improved the survivorship of the same system's cementless tibial component.
Level III.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中新型非骨水泥植入物设计已开始改变长期以来的骨水泥固定做法。无菌性松动是翻修非骨水泥植入物的主要原因之一,初始骨整合对于植入物的长期留存至关重要。近期文献表明,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)在提高植入物准确性方面取得了令人鼓舞的成果。本研究旨在评估机器人辅助是否会影响初次全膝关节置换术中非骨水泥固定的成功率。
回顾性分析了2018年6月至2022年10月期间由五名外科医生植入的来自同一制造商的445个非骨水泥初次全膝关节置换术组件。对那些随访至少一年的患者进行分析。分别对股骨和胫骨组件进行评估,并根据是否采用同一制造商的手动或机器人辅助全膝关节置换术进行分组。采用Fisher精确检验分析两种技术之间无菌性松动率是否存在差异。
纳入了来自单膝关节系统的373个(82%)非骨水泥组件。使用机器人辅助全膝关节置换术植入了146个股骨组件和103个胫骨组件,而手动植入了63个股骨组件和61个胫骨组件。平均随访18个月(范围为12至51个月),所有组件中有96.2%实现了成功固定。两组中均没有股骨组件因无菌性松动而进行翻修。有4个手动植入的胫骨组件因无菌性松动而进行了翻修,而机器人辅助植入的胫骨组件没有(6.6%对0.0%;P = 0.038)。
无论有无机器人辅助,现代非骨水泥股骨组件的性能都非常出色,然而机器人辅助全膝关节置换术提高了同一系统非骨水泥胫骨组件的留存率。
三级。