• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖患者中初次全膝关节置换术采用骨水泥型假体与非骨水泥型假体的生存分析:至少 5 年随访。

Increased Survivorship of Cementless versus Cemented TKA in the Morbidly Obese. A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Franciscan Health Total Joint Reconstruction, Carmel, IN.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):309-314. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.016
PMID:30446183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the morbidly obese patients can be challenging with an increased risk of complications. Studies have shown increased aseptic failures with well-aligned cemented TKAs in the obese patient. The purpose of this study is to determine if TKA in the morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40) using cementless implants would demonstrate improved results and survivorship compared to cemented TKA at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study comparing clinical results of cemented vs cementless primary TKA with a posterior stabilized design TKA in morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40) patients with minimal 5-year follow-up. There were 108 patients in the cementless group with a mean BMI of 45.6. In the cemented cohort, there were 85 cemented TKAs with a mean BMI of 45.0. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiographic data along with complications were extracted for all study patients.

RESULTS

There were 5 failures requiring revision in the cementless group, including 1 for aseptic tibial loosening (0.9%). In the cemented group, there were 22 failures requiring revision, including 16 implants for aseptic loosening (18.8%; P = .0001). Survivorship with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 99.1% in the cementless group vs 88.2% in the cemented cohort at 8 years (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40) have a higher failure due to aseptic loosening with cemented TKA with decreasing survivorship over time. The use of cementless TKA in morbidly obese patients with the potential of durable long-term biologic fixation and increased survivorship appears to be a promising alternative to mechanical cement fixation.

摘要

背景

在病态肥胖患者中进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)具有挑战性,并且并发症的风险增加。研究表明,在肥胖患者中,即使使用对线良好的水泥固定 TKA,无菌性失败的风险也会增加。本研究的目的是确定在病态肥胖患者(体重指数[BMI]≥40)中使用非水泥固定植入物进行 TKA 是否会在至少 5 年的随访中显示出更好的结果和存活率。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,比较了在病态肥胖(BMI≥40)患者中使用后稳定设计的 TKA 进行水泥固定与非水泥固定初次 TKA 的临床结果,随访时间至少为 5 年。非水泥组有 108 例患者,平均 BMI 为 45.6。在水泥组中,有 85 例水泥固定 TKA,平均 BMI 为 45.0。所有研究患者均提取了人口统计学、临床、手术和影像学数据以及并发症。

结果

非水泥组有 5 例需要翻修的失败病例,其中 1 例为无菌性胫骨松动(0.9%)。在水泥组中,有 22 例需要翻修的失败病例,其中 16 例为无菌性松动(18.8%;P=.0001)。以无菌性松动为终点,非水泥组的 8 年存活率为 99.1%,水泥组为 88.2%(P=.02)。

结论

对于水泥固定 TKA,病态肥胖患者(BMI≥40)由于无菌性松动而导致的失败率更高,并且随着时间的推移,存活率逐渐降低。在病态肥胖患者中使用非水泥 TKA 似乎是一种有前途的替代机械水泥固定的方法,因为它具有潜在的长期生物学固定和增加的存活率。

相似文献

1
Increased Survivorship of Cementless versus Cemented TKA in the Morbidly Obese. A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.肥胖患者中初次全膝关节置换术采用骨水泥型假体与非骨水泥型假体的生存分析:至少 5 年随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):309-314. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定初次全膝关节置换术使用相同假体的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1089-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.048. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
3
Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients.肥胖患者中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.025. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Highly Porous Tibial Baseplate in Morbidly Obese Patients: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.骨水泥型全膝关节置换术中使用高多孔胫骨托治疗病态肥胖患者:至少 5 年随访结果。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jul;36(9):995-1000. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748900. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Cementless versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design: A Mean 5-Year Follow-up Study.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型同种假体全膝关节置换术:一项平均 5 年随访研究。
J Knee Surg. 2024 Aug;37(10):724-729. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785192. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
Results of Cemented Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With an Average 10-Year Follow-Up.骨水泥型后稳定型全膝关节置换术治疗肥胖患者的 10 年平均随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2097-2100. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Cemented is not superior to cementless total knee arthroplasty for complications: a propensity score matched analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术治疗并发症的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 May;34(4):1825-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03847-4. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With Body Mass Index ≥35 kg/m: A Contemporary Analysis of 812 Patients.体重指数≥35kg/m²的肥胖患者行骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术:812例患者的当代分析
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Apr;37(4):688-693.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.038. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
9
Uncemented vs Cemented Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 30.非骨水泥固定与骨水泥固定交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术在 BMI 大于 30 的患者中的应用比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1082-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.043. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术中非骨水泥型与骨水泥型胫骨固定的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1510-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.023. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
What Are the Game Changers in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Narrative Review.全膝关节置换术中的变革因素有哪些?一项叙述性综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 20;15(8):389. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080389.
2
Fixation in total knee arthroplasty: are cemented implants still mandatory in younger and obese patients?全膝关节置换术中的固定方式:对于年轻及肥胖患者,骨水泥型假体是否仍为必需?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 26;35(1):282. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04359-5.
3
Cementless total knee arthroplasty: Why, when, and how.非骨水泥全膝关节置换术:为何、何时以及如何进行。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 1;65:102993. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102993. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Global trends in fixation methods for primary total knee arthroplasty: An international registry-based analysis and review of outcomes.初次全膝关节置换术固定方法的全球趋势:基于国际注册机构的分析及疗效综述
J Orthop. 2025 May 23;67:230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.031. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Enhanced improvement and comparable survivorship in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year analysis of patient reported outcomes and 5-year analysis of implant survivorship.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的强化改善及相当的生存率:患者报告结局的2年分析及植入物生存率的5年分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 28;35(1):220. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04318-0.
6
Cemented vs. uncemented total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: A systematic review of implant survival, complications, and clinical outcomes.肥胖患者中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术:关于植入物生存率、并发症及临床结局的系统评价
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 25;70:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.049. eCollection 2025 Dec.
7
Revision Rates for Aseptic Loosening in the Obese Patient: A Comparison Between Stemmed, Uncemented, and Unstemmed Tibial Total Knee Arthroplasty Components.肥胖患者无菌性松动的翻修率:带柄、非骨水泥型和无柄胫骨全膝关节置换组件的比较。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Feb 22;32:101621. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101621. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Short-Term Outcomes of Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Morbid Obesity.病态肥胖患者非骨水泥全膝关节置换术的短期疗效
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Mar 3;9(3). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00299. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
9
Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: current evidence and future perspective.全膝关节置换术中的非骨水泥固定:当前证据与未来展望。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 28;145(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05670-2.
10
Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty is on the Rise. A Report of Patient Demographics and Short-Term Outcomes From the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative.非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术呈上升趋势。密歇根关节置换登记协作质量倡议项目的患者人口统计学和短期结果报告。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Sep 23;29:101499. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101499. eCollection 2024 Oct.