Kim Jong S
Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan, Gangneung, Korea.
J Stroke. 2024 Sep;26(3):349-359. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.02670. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
In patients with stroke caused by cardiac embolism, the responsible heart diseases include atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, sick sinus syndrome, valvular disease, and significant heart failure. When there is no clear source of the embolism, the condition is referred to as "embolic stroke with unknown source (ESUS)." Recent studies have shown that the most common cause of ESUS is a right-to-left cardiac shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, considering that PFOs are found in up to 25% of the general population, their presence does not necessarily indicate causality. In patients with ESUS associated with a PFO, either anticoagulants or antiplatelets are used for the prevention of future strokes or transient ischemic attacks. However, it currently remains unclear which treatment is superior. Nevertheless, recent randomized clinical trials have shown that percutaneous closure of the PFO more effectively reduces the incidence of recurrent strokes compared to medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-related strokes. This benefit is especially significant when the PFO carries high-risk features, such as a large shunt or the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm. Furthermore, the effectiveness of PFO closure has been well documented in young patients (<60 years) with a high-risk PFO development. In other cases, the therapeutic decision should be made through discussion among neurologists, cardiologists, and patients. Notably, in ESUS patients without a PFO, the underlying heart condition itself may be the source of embolism, with left atrial enlargement being the most important factor. Theoretically, anticoagulants such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) would be an effective therapy in these cases. However, recent trials have failed to show that NOACs are superior to antiplatelets in preventing further strokes in these patients. This may be due to the still uncertain definition of emboligenic cardiopathy and the presence of other potential embolic sources, such as mild but emboligenic arterial diseases. Overall, further research is needed to elucidate the source of embolism and to determine an effective management strategy for patients with ESUS.
在因心脏栓塞导致中风的患者中,相关的心脏疾病包括心房颤动、急性心肌梗死、病态窦房结综合征、瓣膜病和严重心力衰竭。当没有明确的栓塞源时,这种情况被称为“不明来源栓塞性中风(ESUS)”。最近的研究表明,ESUS最常见的原因是通过卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的右向左心脏分流。然而,鉴于在高达25%的普通人群中发现有PFO,其存在并不一定意味着存在因果关系。在与PFO相关的ESUS患者中,可使用抗凝剂或抗血小板药物来预防未来的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种治疗方法更优。尽管如此,最近的随机临床试验表明,对于与PFO相关的中风患者,经皮闭合PFO比单纯药物治疗更有效地降低了复发性中风的发生率。当PFO具有高风险特征,如大分流或存在房间隔瘤时,这种益处尤为显著。此外,在有高风险PFO的年轻患者(<60岁)中,PFO闭合的有效性已得到充分证明。在其他情况下,治疗决策应通过神经科医生、心脏病专家和患者之间的讨论来做出。值得注意的是,在没有PFO的ESUS患者中,潜在的心脏状况本身可能是栓塞源,左心房扩大是最重要的因素。理论上,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)等抗凝剂在这些情况下将是一种有效的治疗方法。然而,最近的试验未能表明NOACs在预防这些患者进一步中风方面优于抗血小板药物。这可能是由于致栓性心脏病的定义仍不确定,以及存在其他潜在的栓塞源,如轻度但有致栓性的动脉疾病。总体而言,需要进一步研究以阐明栓塞源,并确定ESUS患者的有效管理策略。