Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland (D.S., G.S., S.N., P.M.).
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece (K.P., G.N.).
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1643-1652. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032453. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score stratifies patients with stroke according to the probability of having a patent foramen ovale (PFO), which (through Bayes theorem and simple assumptions) can be used to estimate the probability that a PFO is pathogenic in a given subgroup of patients with specific features (ie, a given RoPE score value): a higher PFO prevalence corresponds to a higher probability that a PFO is pathogenic. Among alternative mechanisms in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), the actual stroke cause may be covert atrial fibrillation. We aimed to validate the RoPE score in a large ESUS population and investigate the rate of stroke recurrence and new incident atrial fibrillation during follow-up according to PFO status and RoPE score.
We pooled data of consecutive patients with ESUS from 3 prospective stroke registries. We assessed RoPE score’s calibration and discrimination for the presence of PFO (and consequently for the probability that it is pathogenic). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PFO.
Among 455 patients with ESUS (median age 59 years), 184 (40%) had PFO. The RoPE score’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.75. In addition to RoPE score variables, absence of left ventricular hypertrophy, absence of atherosclerosis, and infratentorial lesions were independently associated with PFO. In patients with PFO and RoPE 7 to 10, PFO and RoPE 0 to 6, and without PFO, new incident atrial fibrillation rate was 3.1%, 20.5%, and 31.8%, respectively (log-rank test=6.28, P=0.04). Stroke recurrences in patients with likely pathogenic PFO were not statistically different from other patients.
This multicenter study validates the RoPE score to predict the presence/absence of PFO in patients with ESUS, which strongly suggests that RoPE score is helpful in identifying patients with ESUS with pathogenic versus incidental PFOs. Left ventricular hypertrophy, atherosclerosis, and infratentorial stroke may further improve the score. Low RoPE scores were associated with more incidental atrial fibrillation during 10-year follow-up.
风险悖论栓塞(RoPE)评分根据卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的可能性对中风患者进行分层,这(通过贝叶斯定理和简单假设)可以用于估计在具有特定特征的特定亚组患者中,PFO 是否具有致病性的可能性(即,给定 RoPE 评分值):PFO 的患病率越高,PFO 具有致病性的可能性就越高。在不明来源栓塞性中风(ESUS)的替代机制中,实际中风的原因可能是隐匿性心房颤动。我们旨在验证 RoPE 评分在大型 ESUS 人群中的有效性,并根据 PFO 状态和 RoPE 评分评估随访期间的中风复发率和新发心房颤动率。
我们汇总了来自 3 个前瞻性中风登记处的连续 ESUS 患者的数据。我们评估了 RoPE 评分对 PFO 存在(因此对其具有致病性的可能性)的校准和区分能力。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来识别与 PFO 相关的因素。
在 455 名 ESUS 患者(中位年龄 59 岁)中,184 名(40%)有 PFO。RoPE 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.75。除了 RoPE 评分变量外,左心室肥厚、动脉粥样硬化和幕下病变的缺失也与 PFO 独立相关。在 RoPE 评分 7-10 的 PFO 患者、RoPE 评分 0-6 的 PFO 患者和无 PFO 的患者中,新发心房颤动的发生率分别为 3.1%、20.5%和 31.8%(对数秩检验=6.28,P=0.04)。具有可能致病性 PFO 的患者的中风复发率与其他患者无统计学差异。
这项多中心研究验证了 RoPE 评分可预测 ESUS 患者 PFO 的存在/缺失,这强烈表明 RoPE 评分有助于识别 ESUS 患者中具有致病性与偶发性 PFO 的患者。左心室肥厚、动脉粥样硬化和幕下中风可能进一步提高评分。在 10 年随访期间,低 RoPE 评分与更多偶发性心房颤动相关。