Departamento de Reproducción Animal, INIA-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Arquimea Agrotech, Collado-Villalba, Madrid, Spain.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2024 Oct;59 Suppl 3:e14626. doi: 10.1111/rda.14626.
The present study compares two protocols for the cryopreservation of chicken semen. Both protocols had an initial low cooling rate in the first step, followed by higher cooling rates around ice nucleation (Protocol 1) or following the dissipation of the latent heat of fusion (Protocol 2) in the second step. Semen ejaculates obtained from 12 roosters were diluted with Rootex with 6% dimethylformamide and frozen following either Protocol 1 (from +5°C to -10°C at 5°C/min and from -10°C to -130°C at 60°C/min) or Protocol 2 (from +5°C to -35°C at 7°C/min and from -35°C to -140°C at 60°C/min). Compared with fresh semen, following both protocols, cryopreservation resulted in reduced post-thaw sperm quality (p < .001). Post-thaw percentage of sperm with an intact plasma membrane was greater using Protocol 2 than Protocol 1 (p < .05). The results suggest that high cooling rates around the time of ice nucleation are not recommendable.
本研究比较了两种鸡精液冷冻保存方案。两种方案在第一步中均采用初始低冷却速率,然后在第二步中在冰核形成(方案 1)或在潜热消散时(方案 2)采用较高的冷却速率。从 12 只公鸡获得的精液射精液用含有 6%二甲基甲酰胺的 Rootex 稀释,然后按照方案 1(从+5°C 以 5°C/min 的速率降至-10°C,然后以 60°C/min 的速率降至-130°C)或方案 2(从+5°C 以 7°C/min 的速率降至-35°C,然后以 60°C/min 的速率降至-140°C)进行冷冻。与新鲜精液相比,两种方案的冷冻保存均导致解冻后精子质量下降(p<.001)。与方案 1 相比,方案 2 解冻后具有完整质膜的精子比例更高(p<.05)。结果表明,在冰核形成时采用较高的冷却速率是不可取的。