Muskin Ryan M, Allard Eric S
Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, USA.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2025 May;32(3):427-448. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2024.2414473. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
Emotional reactivity, based on the discrete emotions approach (DEA), is related to opportunities or constraints across development. While prior research suggests sadness to be more adaptive in old age and anger to be more adaptive in young adulthood, there may be facets within these discrete emotion categories that further expand the DEA framework: loss-based vs. failure-based sadness and frustration-based vs. moral violation-based anger. A sample of 49 younger adults ( = 20.00, = 2.26) and 51 older adults ( = 66.00, = 4.94) were asked to relive and describe an emotional memory associated with facets of sadness and anger. Emotional reactivity was operationalized through self-report ratings on distinct facet categories. Results revealed a significant age difference in emotional reactivity to moral violation-based anger, with older adults being more reactive than younger adults. No other significant age differences were observed. These findings are discussed in terms of how further distinctions across emotional facets can inform a better understanding of affective experience across adulthood and old age.
基于离散情绪方法(DEA)的情绪反应性与整个发展过程中的机会或限制有关。虽然先前的研究表明悲伤在老年期更具适应性,愤怒在青年期更具适应性,但在这些离散情绪类别中可能存在一些方面,会进一步扩展DEA框架:基于损失的悲伤与基于失败的悲伤,以及基于挫折的愤怒与基于道德违规的愤怒。研究要求49名年轻人(平均年龄=20.00岁,标准差=2.26)和51名老年人(平均年龄=66.00岁,标准差=4.94)重温并描述与悲伤和愤怒方面相关的情绪记忆。情绪反应性通过对不同方面类别的自我报告评分来衡量。结果显示,在对基于道德违规的愤怒的情绪反应性方面存在显著的年龄差异,老年人比年轻人更具反应性。未观察到其他显著的年龄差异。本文将根据情绪方面的进一步区分如何有助于更好地理解成年期和老年期的情感体验来讨论这些发现。