Cheng Haonan, Osawa Takuya, Palm Jonas, Schaeffer Thibault, Heinisch Paul Philipp, Piber Nicole, Röhlig Christoph, Meierhofer Christian, Georgiev Stanimir, Hager Alfred, Ewert Peter, Hörer Jürgen, Ono Masamichi
Department of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Division of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Cardiol Young. 2024 Dec;34(12):2626-2635. doi: 10.1017/S104795112402609X. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
This study aims to assess the surgical outcome of borderline hypoplastic left ventricle before and after the induction of the left ventricle rehabilitation strategy.
A retrospective review investigated patients with borderline hypoplastic left ventricle who underwent surgical intervention between 2012 and 2022. The patient cohort was stratified into two groups based on the initiation of left ventricle rehabilitation: an early-era group (E group, 2012-2017) and a late-era group (L group, 2018-2022). Left ventricle rehabilitation was defined as palliation combined with other procedures aimed at promoting left ventricular growth such as restriction of atrial septal defect, relief of inflow/outflow obstructive lesions, and resection of endocardial fibroelastosis.
A total of 58 patients were included. Primary diagnosis included 12 hypoplastic left heart syndromes, 11 critical aortic valve stenosis, and others. A total of 9 patients underwent left ventricle rehabilitation, 8 of whom underwent restriction of atrial septal defect. As for clinical outcomes, 9 of 23 patients achieved biventricular repair in the E group, whereas in the L group, 27 of 35 patients achieved biventricular repair (39% vs. 77%, = 0.004). Mortality did not differ statistically between the two groups (log-rank test = 0.182). As for the changes after left ventricle rehabilitation, left ventricular growth was observed in 8 of 9 patients. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (from 11.4 to 30.1 ml/m, = 0.017) and left ventricular apex-to-right ventricular apex ratio (from 86 to 106 %, = 0.014) significantly increased after left ventricle rehabilitation.
The introduction of the left ventricle rehabilitation strategy resulted in an increased proportion of patients achieving biventricular repair without a concomitant increase in mortality. Left ventricle rehabilitation was associated with enhanced left ventricular growth and the formation of a well-defined left ventricle apex. Our study underscores the significance of left ventricle rehabilitation strategies facilitating successful biventricular repair. The data suggest establishing restrictive atrial communication may be a key factor in promoting left ventricular growth.
本研究旨在评估左心室康复策略实施前后临界性左心室发育不良的手术效果。
一项回顾性研究调查了2012年至2022年间接受手术干预的临界性左心室发育不良患者。根据左心室康复的起始情况,将患者队列分为两组:早期组(E组,2012 - 2017年)和晚期组(L组,2018 - 2022年)。左心室康复定义为姑息治疗联合其他旨在促进左心室生长的手术,如房间隔缺损封堵、流入道/流出道梗阻性病变解除以及心内膜弹力纤维增生症切除术。
共纳入58例患者。主要诊断包括12例左心发育不良综合征、11例严重主动脉瓣狭窄等。共有9例患者接受了左心室康复治疗,其中8例接受了房间隔缺损封堵。关于临床结局,E组23例患者中有9例实现双心室修复,而L组35例患者中有27例实现双心室修复(39%对77%,P = 0.004)。两组间死亡率无统计学差异(对数秩检验P = 0.182)。关于左心室康复后的变化,9例患者中有8例观察到左心室生长。左心室舒张末期容积指数(从11.4至30.1 ml/m²,P = 0.017)和左心室心尖至右心室心尖比值(从86%至106%,P = 0.014)在左心室康复后显著增加。
左心室康复策略的引入使实现双心室修复的患者比例增加,且死亡率未随之增加。左心室康复与左心室生长增强及明确的左心室心尖形成相关。我们的研究强调了左心室康复策略对成功进行双心室修复的重要性。数据表明建立限制性心房交通可能是促进左心室生长的关键因素。