Naeher Dominik, De Lombaerde Philippe, Saber Takfarinas
Department of Development Economics, University of Goettingen, Waldweg 26, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.
Neoma Business School, Rouen, France.
Int Econ Econ Policy. 2025;22(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10368-024-00632-w. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Previous work in the literature on regional economic integration has proposed the use of machine learning algorithms to evaluate the composition of customs unions, specifically, to estimate the degree to which customs unions match "natural markets" arising from trade flow data or appear to be driven by other factors such as political considerations. This paper expands upon the static approaches used in previous studies to develop a dynamic framework that allows to evaluate not only the composition of customs unions at a given point in time, but also changes in the composition over time resulting from accessions of new member states. We then apply the dynamic algorithm to evaluate the evolution of the global landscape of customs unions using data on bilateral trade flows of 200 countries from 1958 to 2018. A key finding is that there is considerable variation across different accession rounds of the European Union as to the extent to which these are aligned with the structure of "natural markets," with some accession rounds following more strongly a commercial logic than others. Similar results are also found for other customs unions in the world, complementing the insights obtained from static analyses.
以往关于区域经济一体化的文献研究提出使用机器学习算法来评估关税同盟的构成,具体而言,就是估计关税同盟与由贸易流量数据产生的“自然市场”的匹配程度,或者评估关税同盟是否似乎受到政治考量等其他因素的驱动。本文在以往研究采用的静态方法基础上进行拓展,构建了一个动态框架,该框架不仅能够评估特定时间点关税同盟的构成,还能评估因新成员国加入而导致的关税同盟构成随时间的变化。然后,我们运用该动态算法,利用1958年至2018年200个国家的双边贸易流量数据,来评估关税同盟全球格局的演变。一个关键发现是,欧盟不同的扩大轮次在与“自然市场”结构的契合程度上存在相当大的差异,其中一些扩大轮次比其他扩大轮次更严格地遵循商业逻辑。在世界其他关税同盟中也发现了类似结果,补充了从静态分析中获得的见解。